What 1996 sequel of a sequel grossed $255 million less than the original movie?

bjb	Aladdin King of Thieves would be my best guess. Jun 10 09, 5:23 PM

daBomb619

Well, "Aladdin" made $504,050,219, while "Aladdin: King of Thieves" made about $186 million, with a difference of about $318 million, so that is probably not correct. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aladdin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aladdin_and_the_King_of_Thieves Jun 10 09, 8:25 PM

Allisonbob

Rocky 3 Jun 11 09, 5:16 AM

busted123

Must say that a search through the link http://www.boxofficemojo.com showed me there was no 'Rocky' released in '96: they went this way = Rocky ?, Rocky II, '79 release for about $117 million plus, Rocky III in '82 for about $122m plus and so on. All I can find of interest to me are the series of Star Trek movies. BUT THEY GO BACKWARD THAN THE SEQUENCE YOU WANT '79, which got about $82+ million, then a succession of about seven altogether. In 1996, 'Star Trek: First Contact' (one of the first sequels of a movie made from that TV show) made about $92+ million, then the sequel of that sequel, just released and going strong is Jun 12 09, 5:21 AM

busted123

Got cut off again by clumsy hands here, sorry. Anyway, they are usually going BACKWARD than you're asking for: the '96 Star Trek movie: 'First Contact' made about $92+ million and now the movie just released this summer or spring has already made over $225+ million as a very-far removed sequel - in fact, it's a prequel - which makes this all kinda' circular anyway, doesn't it? That's all I know, and a very fun and informative (and free) site to use to learn a lot about movies. Just want you to know I saw no 'Rocky' feature made in '96, going backward, forward or where no man has gone before. Jun 12 09, 5:27 AM