|
|
One of them wasn't a pope, and the other one was, even though he wasn't. What was the main difference between them apart from this, and who were they?
Question
#110514. Asked by Baloo55th.
|
queproblema
|
Hippolytus of Rome is sometimes considered the first Antipope, meaning a pope who is not the Bishop of Rome.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antipope
Legend has it he was dragged to his death behind horses. He had his ins and outs with Rome, but is now considered a saint--of horses, of course!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippolytus_of_Rome
The main difference between him and the other Hippolytus is that the other one lived only in Greek myth. (Or maybe Baloo has in mind any of several other differences.) He was likewise dragged to his death behind horses. This page has two beautiful and bloodless depictions of the dragging.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippolytus_%28mythology%29
|
unclerick
|
Alexander Pope wasn't a pope. He was a poet
Pope Alexander V was a pope, even though he wasn't.
Pope Alexander V was an antipope. This is defined as a person who, in opposition to a sitting Bishop of Rome, makes a widely accepted claim to be pope. In the past antipopes were typically those supported by a fairly significant faction of cardinals and kingdoms. The Catholic Church of today does not recognize him as a pope. If you click on the newadvent link (Catholic encyclopedia) and scroll down to to the years 1409 to 1410 you will not see him listed, it just says antipope.
The main difference between the two was that the poet Alexander Pope was physically deformed. His height at adulthood was 4 1/2 feet (1.37m). He had a form of TB that affects the spine and was sometimes cruelly called a "hunchback toad". Among other things he is remembered today for the statement "a little learning is a dangerous thing".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antipope
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12272b.htm
http://www.world-class-poetry.com/Alexander-Pope.html
|
Baloo55th

|
Nice tries - good reasoning - but... Not the fellers I'm looking for. Neither of them was in any way a Bishop of Rome, legit or not. But withal, one was a pope even though he wasn't...
|
Baloo55th

|
Rather apt in some ways to have an attempt by un-cleric-k.....
|
unclerick
|
Hi Baloo
I had to read it a few times before I got the joke. A bit slow.
Uncle Rick
|
Create a Free
FunTrivia ID to add
to,
request more/new answers, or
edit this entry
Other Similar Questions & Answers
Suggested Related FunTrivia Quizzes - 90,000 currently online
"Ask FunTrivia" is for entertainment purposes only, and answers offered are unverified and unchecked by
FunTrivia. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or veracity of ANY statement posted. Feel free to post an updated
response
if you feel that an answer is inadequate or incorrect. Please
thoroughly research items where accuracy is important to you using multiple reliable sources. By accessing our
website, you agree to be bound by our terms of service.
|