|
|
Which cost more, to make the movie "Animal House", or its ad budget?
Question
#121128. Asked by 29CoveRoad. (Apr 17 11 4:38 PM)
|
star_gazer

|
Upon its initial release, Animal House received generally mixed reviews from critics, but Time and Roger Ebert proclaimed it one of the year's best. Filmed for $2.7 million, it is one of the most profitable movies of all time; since its initial release, Animal House has garnered an estimated return of more than $141 million in the form of video and DVDs, not including merchandising.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Lampoon's_Animal_House
|
Baloo55th

|
I think the question means which was greater, the cost of the film or what they spent on advertising it. Probably the advertising - that's not a high budget for making a film.
|
star_gazer

|
I searched and I could not find the amount spent on advertising.
|
29CoveRoad
|
Its ad budget was more
|
looney_tunes

|
Can you please supply a link to some figures to show that?
|
Find something useful here? Please help us spread the word about FunTrivia. Recommend this page below!
|