Quizzes at Fun Trivia Fun Trivia | quizzes Quizzes | games Games | community People | services Services | help Help | me Me
New Player - Log In
Currently 11360 players online.   Trivia games, quizzes, and contests - FREE !     Get Started! quiz register


  • New Questions

  • Unanswered

  • Revisited

  • Your Questions


  • Post a Question
  • Goto Qn #



    111,167 questions asked
    383,185 replies


    Archives

    Cricket question. The batting side require two runs to win - the ball is played into the outfield and, although not reaching the boundary there is time for the batsmen to run three. On completion of the second run the umpire at the bowler's end calls 'time' and removes the bails believing the match to be over. The square leg umpire then calls the first run short. The scorers have made no errors. For the purposes of Law 21(9) would this count as a mistake in the scoring that would allow the match to resume unless the last available ball had been bowled?

    Question #20990. Asked by Michael Poultney.

    tented

    Surely (a) the umpire would not complete the match if the batsmen were still running and (b) if the square leg umpire was so slow as not the signal the first run short until the 2nd run was completed (unlikely) if he signalled after the other umpire had officially 'closed' the match it would be ignored

    Jul 30 02, 11:15 AM
    Michael Poultney

    Please note that (i) an umpire would normally remove the bails when the winning run was made since extra runs would not count unless scored as a boundary the game being over if both runs were legitimate and (ii) short runs are not called by the umpires until the ball is dead otherwise they could be rectified.


    Jul 30 02, 5:44 PM
    oleg_mcnoleg

    Looks like a bit of a conundrum within the laws this one.

    Technically the result should stand (as time has been called) BUT there are sufficient loop holes within the section on 'The Umpires' giving them enough discretion to re-commence play. It also states that the umpires should discuss any potentially confusing calls themselves and this would allow a re-call of play.

    Other possible 'predural' get-outs would be law 27.7 (Batsman leaving the field under a misapprehension) and 27.9 (Umpire may change his mind). Both of these refere to appeals for dismissals but do give some form of precedent for 'sense' to prevail.

    As a footnote i've played in a game where the team batting second had to win twice (first one was a scoring error). This is not an uncommon event in club cricket!!

    Jul 30 02, 10:25 PM
    Fosse4

    Dead right Oleg - I've played in a number of games where the players have trooped off to check the score books to see if there has been a result (and gone back on to carry on playing for an over or two to make sure of the result)

    Regarding the question - Once the Umpire has called time the game is over- regardless of the result. (My Opinion)
    http://www-uk.cricket.org/link_to_database/ABOUT_CRICKET/LAWS/2000_CODE/

    is the official line, you can join and debate the rules to your hearts content.



    Jul 30 02, 10:49 PM
    oleg_mcnoleg

    Michael - suggest you go to Cricinfo and he'll give you the real 'expert' opinion but i reckon it'll be no different to what you see here!

    Aug 01 02, 9:23 AM

    Create a Free FunTrivia ID to add to, request more/new answers, or edit this entry

    Other Similar Questions & Answers


    Cricket question. In the last match of a season the batting side require one run to win the match but four runs of the next ball to overtake their opponents on average run rate throughout the season and secure the championship. Would it be in the interests of the bowling side then to bowl a deliberate no ball?

    Cricket question. Nine wickets are down in the final innings,the scores are level and a batsman is hit wicket off a wide ball. Am I correct in assuming that this is a tie regardless of whether the ball had past the striker's wicket at the instant it was struck,but that, had the potential wicket been stumped, the wide would count and the batting side would win by one wicket ?

    Who is the all-time home run leader for the Pittsburgh Pirates and how many home runs did he have?

    There is a popular toy consisting of five steel balls, all of the same size and mass, hanging side by side in a row (many people keep them on their desks). Pull out the end ball and drop it against the row, and one pops of the other end. If two balls are pulled aside and dropped together, two pop out from the other end. The balls seem to count! How do they accomplish this trick?

    Suggested Related FunTrivia Quizzes - 90,000 currently online

    1 All Time Home Run Hitters
    A short quiz on great home run hitters.
    Batting Records Average
    5 Q
    struction
    Oct 05 02
    2943 plays
    2 Run! Run! Run!
    I don't know what it is about running, but a disproportionate number of my favourite rock songs have "run" or "running" in the title! (Most of these are considered classic rock; if that's not your cup of tea the quiz probably won't be, either.)
    Walking and Running in Songs Tough
    15 Q
    Dukasaur
    Jan 25 07
    702 plays
    3 Wanna be a Cricket Umpire?
    A quiz on some of the interesting and esoteric laws of the sport.
    Cricket Umpires Average
    10 Q
    ricemaster
    Jan 12 04
    1203 plays


    "Ask FunTrivia" is for entertainment purposes only, and answers offered are unverified and unchecked by FunTrivia. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or veracity of ANY statement posted. Feel free to post an updated response if you feel that an answer is inadequate or incorrect. Please thoroughly research items where accuracy is important to you using multiple reliable sources. By accessing our website, you agree to be bound by our terms of service.