|
|
Question
#41421. jasper9lives
asks:
Who won the Rugby World Cup in 2003?
|
mochyn
|
Well I'm sure that the score was 20 -17 to England but maybe Shady would disagree
Nov 22 03, 9:40 AM
|
MaggieG 5
 |
It certainly was England after a last minute goal by Jonny Wilkinson. Superb, nailbiting stuff and a jolly good match. Well done to both teams.
Nov 22 03, 10:25 AM
|
mibmob
|
20 -17 it was and a fairytale ending. Sorry to all our Australian friends out there.....not really!
Nov 22 03, 10:49 AM
|
mochyn
|
YAY ,Mibby ,rub it in ,Shady needs to eat humble pie
Nov 22 03, 11:20 AM
|
mibmob
|
shady is probably in bed now, sobbing. He certainly needs to eat humble pie though after all the drubbing he gave England supporters!
Nov 22 03, 11:21 AM
|
sue943
 |
Come on, we must be sporting so let's give a big cheer to the team who came second! Well done lads.
Nov 22 03, 11:49 AM
|
shady shaker
|
I'd like to say that neither team deserved to lose, but England was by far the better team. Had the match been played on a dry pitch, they would have won far more easily. What was all that nonsense in the local media about England being boring??
Nov 22 03, 1:14 PM
|
mibmob
|
Hallo shady! What are you doing up at this time? I'm not sure - if it had been drier I think you guys might have scored more tries or there would have been fewer penalties. For once English-type weather helped us. Have a nice cocktail and look forward to the next world cup when you will snatch the cup from us - perhaps! (See how, like the Romans, I can be generous in victory)!!!
Nov 22 03, 1:18 PM
|
Linus_337
|
It was the best game I can recall seeing - fair play to the Aussies for making it a real nail-biter, but England were magnificent.
And it's about time we won something...
Nov 22 03, 4:55 PM
|
|