Fun Trivia | Quizzes | Games | People | Services | Help | Me
The Buzz - Register
Log In
Sign up for your FREE FunTrivia ID! Compete, play free games, and meet people! Click here...

Posting Rules: PLEASE READ -- Moderated by McGruff

Search Question Database:



Home > Ask FunTrivia



Have a question that you want answered? Are you able to answer questions from other FunTrivia guests? Then you have come to the right place!

  • New Questions Today


  • Unanswered
  • Most Recent Replies
  • Most Active Threads


  • Most Frequent Posters


  • Post a Question
  • Read Me: Board Rules

    Goto Qn #



    101,177 questions asked
    357,967 replies


    Archives

    1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186  187  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202 
    Question #52137. picqero asks:

    Do the US Electoral College votes, which vary from state to state, have an actual human counterpart? i.e. Are there actual Electoral College individual members?




    MrsAce

    Yes, they are each state's Senators and Representatives.

    [Nov 03 04 1:42 PM] MrsAce writes:

    To clarify, it's each state's US Senators and Representatives, not state.

    There are 538 possible votes which is why the winner must reach 270, so as not to tie at 269. I've read that a tie has never happened, but in the event it does the vote then goes to the House of Representatives to pick the President.

    Nov 03 04, 1:34 PM
    grumpywop

    The only previous tie was in 1800 when Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr each got 73 electoral votes. The House chose Jefferson and Burr, under the system then in place, became vice president.

    http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/27/campaign.tie.reut/

    Nov 03 04, 2:23 PM
    picqero

    So presumably all of the senators and representatives of a particular State must belong to the same party? - Forgive me please if this is obvious - it's not to me, I'd imagined that they could belong to different parties depending on the county or area they represented. Presumably too, the assumption is made that all the senators and representatives of a party would vote for and support their party's choice of President. I'd have thought that quite a few republicans might support the general aims of their party, but might strongly disagree with Bush's policies on Iraq and environmental issues.

    Nov 03 04, 3:58 PM
    MrsAce

    No, they would, or could, belong to different parties. If the popular vote for the state goes to the Republican candidate, then all Democratic and Repulican Senators and Representatives must give their electoral vote to that candidate. There are only 2 states that I'm aware of that can split their votes and they are Maine and Nebraska. I'm not so sure how that works. In all other states the entire number of electoral votes goes to one candidate.

    [Nov 04 04 2:02 PM] MrsAce writes:

    It's a very confusing process, but Wikipedia explains it okay.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Electoral_College

    Nov 03 04, 8:12 PM
    kevinatilusa

    Although the number of electoral college votes each state gets is equal to the number of Senators and representatives, but they are NOT the same people!

    Each party has a slate of electors, people they have chosen before the election to represent them. When people vote in each state, they are actually voting on a set of electors to take part in the final vote. Those electors will usually vote for the person nominated by the party who chose them as electors. For example, since a plurality of California's voters voted Democratic, 54 people previously chosen by the Democratic party will take part in the Electoral College vote, and all 54 of them will probably vote for Kerry.

    However, there are occasionally people who go against the grain. For example, one of the three Democratic electors from the District of Columbia abstained in 2000 in protest of D.C. not having full representation in congress. I do not believe these "faithless electors" have ever made a difference in the outcome of the election.

    Nov 03 04, 10:39 PM
    kevinatilusa

    "Winner take all" here means that all the electors for a given state will be chosen off of a single slate (the one corresponding to the candidate with the most votes in a state).

    Maine and Nebraska each take two electors corresponding to the candidate receiving the most votes in a state, and one elector corresponding to whoever wins each congressional district. For example, if Bush had taken a majority of votes in Northern Maine, but Kerry had taken a majority in the south and in the state, there would be one Bush elector chosen (for the one district he won), and three Kerry electors chosen (one for the district he won, two for the state).

    I don't know if the candidates have to submit a separate list of electors for each district or if they have a single statewide list that they take electors off of for each district they win.

    Nov 03 04, 10:42 PM
    Explore FunTrivia.com Further! - There are curently 9275 players online!
    Thousands of free games, quizzes, and competitions!