|
|
What is meant by 'Deity E' and 'Deity J'?
Question
#551. Asked by bjs.
|
essaychess
|
Many biblical scholars talk of several biblical 'sources', to account for certain discrepencies, etc. Deity E refers to Elohim, or the Elohist source, using a generic name for god. Deity J refers to Jehovah, or the Yahwist source, using the more personal Hebrew name for god.
|
keats27
|
Essaychess, I've been aware of this for awhile, but never knew it was explained in this way before. Where did you find that answer?
|
Baloo55th
|
If you read the early parts of the Bible carefully you will find the name used for God changes in places. And the style changes. One main style is racy and popular, the other main one is drier and more bean-counting. The two were obviously both very well known in the days when the early books of the Bible were put together, and the compilers were rather stretched at times to fit them both in. This is why you get different accounts of the Creation, and of the Flood. Look in Wikipedia for Jahwist and Elohist, and Google also for P-source and J-source. And read the Bible as I said.
|
Arpeggionist

|
The terms "E" and "J" are a popular tool in biblical criticism these days. Their differenciation is based on the idea that each way of referring to God refers to a different side of God's work or a different author (or set of authors). In fact, the words "Elohim" and "Y'hovah" are used much more interchangably than biblical scholars and critics like to think, and are often mixed (as in "Y'hovah Elohim") in the text, so the simple "E-J" dichotomy can only get one so far when discussing biblical matters.
|
AyatollahK
|
While there are certainly interchangeable uses of E & J (in German, Y in Hebrew) in the text, the idea that the sources refer to God differently is fundamental to the 18th century analysis of "doublets" in the Pentateuch/Torah/Bible and the later development of the "Documentary Hypothesis".
http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_tora1.htm
"These doublets appeared to contradict each other. In most cases, one referred to God as Yahweh while the other used the term Elohim."
|
Baloo55th
|
More obvious than the name used (if one refers back to Arpy's origional Hebrew) is the style. One source is from a story-teller, someone used to entertaining an audience. The other is, as I said, bean-counting. This is the Priestly source, which is keen on numberings and rules as opposed to action and a good tale.
|
Create a Free
FunTrivia ID to add
to,
request more/new answers, or
edit this entry
Other Similar Questions & Answers
Suggested Related FunTrivia Quizzes - 90,000 currently online
 |
'J' is for.....
|
Up to part 10 now and still going on and on and on and etc. O.K. you know how it works, no? I give you a scenario involving a word beginning with 'J' and you guess the answer. Simple. Enjoy!
|
|
Words A - M
|
Tough
10 Q
|
kristian88
Aug 22 03
510 plays
|
 |
J It Is
|
Jaydel's ultimate J quiz finally has arrived. Hard labor it was, I tell you, as there are not so many suitable J-words. But ten questions there are, an opportunity for you to score 100 points. Why don't you give it a go?
|
|
J
|
Tough
10 Q
|
jaydel
Nov 21 05
1158 plays
|
 |
E.T.
|
One of the best movies ever made. And yes, I still cry every single time I see it!
|
|
E.T.
|
Average
15 Q
|
tatsiko
Feb 12 03
6753 plays
|
|
"Ask FunTrivia" is for entertainment purposes only, and answers offered are unverified and unchecked by
FunTrivia. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or veracity of ANY statement posted. Feel free to post an updated
response
if you feel that an answer is inadequate or incorrect. Please
thoroughly research items where accuracy is important to you using multiple reliable sources. By accessing our
website, you agree to be bound by our terms of service.
|