Fun Trivia | Quizzes | Games | People | Services | Help | Me
The Buzz - Register
Log In
Sign up for your FREE FunTrivia ID! Compete, play free games, and meet people! Click here...

Posting Rules: PLEASE READ -- Moderated by McGruff

Search Question Database:



Home > Ask FunTrivia



Have a question that you want answered? Are you able to answer questions from other FunTrivia guests? Then you have come to the right place!

  • New Questions Today


  • Unanswered
  • Most Recent Replies
  • Most Active Threads


  • Most Frequent Posters


  • Post a Question
  • Read Me: Board Rules

    Goto Qn #



    101,218 questions asked
    358,067 replies


    Archives

    1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152  153  154  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173  174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186  187  188  189  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202 
    Question #62952. peasypod asks:

    It was once displayed in a prominent US museum which paid well over 2 million dollars for it. Later accounts reveal that it was rejected at another prominent museum in the 1930's for its authenticity. What was the object, which museum suffered the blunder and where did the 'copy' originate from?




    lanfranco

    I'm thinking about it, as is the Maven, but everything we've considered doesn't quite fit the description. Either the price is wrong, or I can't confirm that the object was on offer in the 30's and regarded as dubious by some museum's curatorial staff. The closest I came was the Kimbell's Sumerian statue disaster, but it was never exhibited.

    And, of course, if this isn't a standard work of art, but rather a book, a document, a coin, a stamp, or a musical instrument, I could spend weeks on this.

    But I shall persist. Never fear.

    Mar 01 06, 5:44 PM
    peasypod

    Now that you mention it, I've researched it a little further and the amounts seem to fluctuate. Some references say 2 million, others say 1 million. As to the type of art piece, I'm feeling rather generous today so I'll blurt out that the tortoise might still make it...

    Mar 01 06, 8:21 PM
    peasypod

    You still out there 'thinking' Frankie? A quickie clue------I'm sure the folks at J.Paul Getty are rather sheepish about the whole affair.

    Apr 01 06, 5:30 PM
    peasypod

    Ok, Frankie, after 4 months are you still persisting or shall I throw another clue?

    Jun 21 06, 5:17 AM
    lanfranco

    I'd forgotten about this one.

    How about the "Skopas" head of Achilles, which turned out to be a probable copy by a student of a cast in Athens? The Metropolitan in New York turned it down in the 30's.

    When I was a grad student, we were assigned a little Getty publication on this head called "Skopas in Malibu." We found that title infinitely amusing for some reason. However, I could write a much longer book on the subject of the antiquities problems at the Getty:


    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE1DD1E38F937A35752C1A96E948260

    Jun 23 06, 11:28 AM
    peasypod

    Thank the Lord. Lemme just blow the dust off this banana.

    Jun 23 06, 5:15 PM
    Explore FunTrivia.com Further! - There are curently 7028 players online!
    Thousands of free games, quizzes, and competitions!