This is a list of staff members who have indicated that they wouldn't mind being interviewed. The original idea is to get to know staff members, some prolific authors and longer term members.

Please add your name to the list if you would be prepared to be interviewed at some time and fall within the above boundaries.

sue943
romeomikegolf
ren33
LeoDaVinci
McGruff
skunkee
Gatsby722
LadyCaitriona
spanishliz
kyleisalive
Pagiedamon
NatalieW
bloomsby
ozfei
ozzz2002
jmorrow
Snowman
Sypher
denni19
DakotaNorth
TabbyTom
ladymacb29
CellarDoor
ertrum
crisw

Well I have no idea if anyone is actually interested in learning about me, lol, but if so I would not object.

I don't think I'm very interesting, but I'll do it.

Sure, I'll answer an interview

I'm not an author of any quizzes nor am I a staff member, but I am a long term member. I have no objections.

I've probably mentioned it all already, but happy to have it all put in one place.

If anybody would be interested, I'm up for it. I'm not sure if I qualify as 'prolific'..

QB, you are always too modest.

Clara, I think nearly 5k posts puts you in the well known members category.

If anyone thinks I'm interesting enough, I'll be happy to answer questions

FYI, the interviews with staff members are going to be completed first. This was the original idea from the feedback section. It is great to see so many interested in taking part.

Sure I'll give it a go. Sounds like fun!

You can put my name on the list, too.

Sure, if anyone wants to interview me, I'm down.

This is a cool idea. Really dig it and I think it's a great way to learn more about the other people around us on this site.

I may not be long term, and I'm not really active on the quiz side of things, but I'm open to be interviewed.

Ella, you've been around the site for four years. Who says you're not long term?

As of late I haven't been around much at least...I've been reading lots but not posting a great amount. Quite a few of the newer posters probably don't know me well.

Ella's post has thrown up what could be seen as a potential problem. Do we limit the initial interviews to active members or do we allow any one to be interviewd? Personally I think we should stick to staff and those others that have been active over the last year or so. This will give less active posters a chance to make themselves known before going thorough the grill. Your thoughts would be appreciated.

That makes a lot of sense to me. The initial suggestion was to get to know the staff and some of the authors and longer-term members.

That's a good idea. To interview say, a relatively new and fairly inactive person woudn't be interesting to the majority of members.

However, there have been at least 2 or 3 people that have registered since I have been here that have made an immediate impression. Within the first 2 months of posting they felt like old family. I think it should be left to a gut feeling, after following vague guidelines.

There is one person I don't see on the list: Terry. That is the person I would most like to see interviewed. I know he's the owner and pillar of this site, and probably won't, but I always wonder things like: What prompted you to even start Fun Trivia? How gratifying is it to work with so many wonderful volunteers? etc.

I think it will be fun to be interviewed. Count me in.

Not that anyone necessarily cares, but I put my bio up some time ago as the first entry in my blog. Others may have done similar things.

http://www.funtrivia.com/~JMElston

Happy Personal Trivia!

You could interview me, if you ever get bored or run out of cool people to talk to.

Better bump Roofoo up the line into the Cool People category then, where she belongs. I'd also like to second the suggestion of lioness, another interesting person on our forums.

I'm game

If you run out of people I don't mind either.