#830875 - Thu Oct 11 2012 10:05 AM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: AntonLaVey]
|
Enthusiast
Registered: Wed Oct 15 2008
Posts: 496
Loc: Arkansas USA
|
I sort of agree with this, mainly with jabb5076. I've never quite understood why people play games in which they are already a champion when there are so many other games and quizzes they can play. If it's to get a badge, I understand; if it's to get points, then why not play other games? I rarely play "Who's the Expert?" categories I've already won, unless it's required (for example, The Great Quiz Race or Daily Challenges). Some people play them just because they love that game, and it is one of their favorite activities here. Then, for the games that count towards team scores, there are those who play them to get points for their team. I never thought about team scores. I've never cared about my team score (except on team games) and my team doesn't make a big deal about it, so that never crossed my mind. The best solution is to just ditch all ELO ratings and make all Champ divisions like Who Am I is now. Multiple sets and no ELO.
ELO serves no purpose anyway, and it might even make the server run that much smoother. I agree. I don't care about ELO, I'm not sure how it's calculated or what it is, and it wouldn't matter to me if it was deleted.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#830877 - Thu Oct 11 2012 10:29 AM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: Buddy1]
|
Participant
Registered: Sat Feb 12 2011
Posts: 24
Loc: Ohio USA
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#831022 - Thu Oct 11 2012 09:09 PM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: seadancer]
|
Multiloquent
Registered: Tue Jan 20 2009
Posts: 2356
Loc: Briar Hill Victoria Australia
|
At least in most games, the questions are the same, the competition is more difficult. So you can get the same scores, but your name shows up lower (often, for me, MUCH lower) in the table of results.
_________________________
(Editor, Humanities, Literature and Books For Children) That's all, folks!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#831024 - Thu Oct 11 2012 09:34 PM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: looney_tunes]
|
Multiloquent
Registered: Mon Mar 07 2005
Posts: 4967
Loc: Canada, eh!
|
I suggested that Champs who aren't performing well over a period of time might be automatically (or at their request) taken out of the Champ classification and moved down. This could potentially be very unfair, in my opinion as there would be nothing stopping front-runners from dropping down into the lower divisions and dominating all over again. They'd either need to slack for a little bit (which is completely doable with high ELO ratings) or simply ask to go lower. In most games it wouldn't be fair though-- these people would have monthly badges signifying their proficiency in the game over a long period of time. Would it be fair to put some of the highest scorers back down with the first-timers?
_________________________
Senior FT Editor (Video Games, Television, Music, and Entertainment) Chat Board Moderator (Author's Lounge) Amazing Trivia Race Taskmaster/Commission Hander-Outer
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#831026 - Thu Oct 11 2012 09:54 PM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: kyleisalive]
|
Prolific
Registered: Tue Feb 20 2007
Posts: 1610
Loc: Mumbai India
|
Honestly, there doesn't seem to be any end to this. Earlier there was just one set. Then people started complaining that the top ranked players, mostly those who had been on the site for long, were winning all the time making the games frustrating for new comers. So we had the different divisions based on player levels. Complaints again started that players who had won all the badges were still playing and making it difficult for others to win the badges. That led to the Champions division - once you had all the badges that could be won in the game, you were moved here (I think this is true for all games except the Who Am I? but I'm not certain). Now again there is a problem with the ELO ratings.
My suggestion is to just ignore the ratings. Personally, my performance swings wildly in most games (except for Who Am I? where I'm almost always at the bottom), so my rating is at best average though I do manage to win games in most hourlies at least some of the time.
Even if Terry does make changes to address this concern right now, going by the past track record, there will soon be some other aspect that frustrates or annoys players. We'll just have to draw the line somewhere.
_________________________
"Don't do something permanently stupid just because you are temporarily upset."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#831027 - Thu Oct 11 2012 10:11 PM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: zorba_scank]
|
Multiloquent
Registered: Mon Mar 07 2005
Posts: 4967
Loc: Canada, eh!
|
Honestly, there doesn't seem to be any end to this. Earlier there was just one set. Then people started complaining that the top ranked players, mostly those who had been on the site for long, were winning all the time making the games frustrating for new comers. So we had the different divisions based on player levels. Complaints again started that players who had won all the badges were still playing and making it difficult for others to win the badges. That led to the Champions division - once you had all the badges that could be won in the game, you were moved here (I think this is true for all games except the Who Am I? but I'm not certain). Now again there is a problem with the ELO ratings.
My suggestion is to just ignore the ratings. Personally, my performance swings wildly in most games (except for Who Am I? where I'm almost always at the bottom), so my rating is at best average though I do manage to win games in most hourlies at least some of the time.
Even if Terry does make changes to address this concern right now, going by the past track record, there will soon be some other aspect that frustrates or annoys players. We'll just have to draw the line somewhere. THIS!  I think this exactly. It ain't broke.
_________________________
Senior FT Editor (Video Games, Television, Music, and Entertainment) Chat Board Moderator (Author's Lounge) Amazing Trivia Race Taskmaster/Commission Hander-Outer
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#831087 - Fri Oct 12 2012 09:16 AM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: kyleisalive]
|
Mainstay
Registered: Tue Aug 11 2009
Posts: 738
Loc: Glasgow Scotland UK
|
I agree - the competition in the Champs division is more for fun, as there are no badges to be won (with the exception of the mastery badges) for coming out on top. Otherwise, it's mostly bragging rights.  Rejoice at the fact that you've been good enough to get into the Champs divisions! Relax a little and enjoy the games instead of worrying about the competition  If you win, that's great, but you're still getting the points for participating, wherever you rank. For me, it's more a competition with myself, trying to get the scores in the game I know I'm capable of, rather than what the best of the best are capable of. Focusing on your own game might allow you to improve enough to beat those top dogs every once in a while, you never know!
_________________________
Richard
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#831094 - Fri Oct 12 2012 10:22 AM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: flopsymopsy]
|
Forum Champion
Registered: Thu Nov 01 2007
Posts: 6962
Loc: Colorado USA
|
Even if we attempt to "fix" this problem, a new one will arise. You cannot please everyone all the time. If we were to rid of the ELO, or champs division altogether, I would not be happy; I like the champs division. Further, everyone would be upset once again for having all the top competitors back in their divisions. Sometimes it's nice that all the players who never lose are put in their own division. I'd never win Expert if daBomb were in my division again.  I still think it's fine as it is. Seadancer, I was not saying you said to make the champs division easier. I was stating a general statement to all, not to you.
Edited by salami_swami (Fri Oct 12 2012 01:03 PM)
_________________________
Subliminal message being sent. Did it work?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#831232 - Sat Oct 13 2012 08:23 AM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: Barbarini]
|
Forum Champion
Registered: Thu Nov 01 2007
Posts: 6962
Loc: Colorado USA
|
Tim Tams? Delicious. I'll take some. And some coffee, for a Tim tam slam. They're manufactured and sold in the US too, btw, by Abbot'ssisyer company, Pepperidge Farms.  Though no American I've talked to seems to know that. Lol
_________________________
Subliminal message being sent. Did it work?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#831234 - Sat Oct 13 2012 08:50 AM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: salami_swami]
|
Multiloquent
Registered: Sat May 17 2008
Posts: 2207
Loc: Northampton England UK
|
Stop talking about Tim Tams! I stopped eating cake, chocolate, and biscuits back in the summer and now I really, really want to p.p.p.pick up a Penguin!
_________________________
The Hubble Telescope has just picked up a sound from a fraction of a second before the Big Bang. The sound was "Uh oh".
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#831237 - Sat Oct 13 2012 09:18 AM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: flopsymopsy]
|
Forum Champion
Registered: Thu Nov 01 2007
Posts: 6962
Loc: Colorado USA
|
Ooh, penguin.
_________________________
Subliminal message being sent. Did it work?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#831238 - Sat Oct 13 2012 09:47 AM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: flopsymopsy]
|
Prolific
Registered: Sun Jan 17 2010
Posts: 1559
Loc: Sydney NSW Australia
|
Stop talking about Tim Tams! I stopped eating cake, chocolate, and biscuits back in the summer and now I really, really want to p.p.p.pick up a Penguin! Have some carrot cake. Bunnies like carrots right? And you get some extra fibre 
_________________________
I could give up chocolate but I'm no quitter!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#831239 - Sat Oct 13 2012 09:55 AM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: Tizzabelle]
|
Multiloquent
Registered: Sat May 17 2008
Posts: 2207
Loc: Northampton England UK
|
Get thee behind me thou temptress!
_________________________
The Hubble Telescope has just picked up a sound from a fraction of a second before the Big Bang. The sound was "Uh oh".
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#831270 - Sat Oct 13 2012 12:02 PM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: flopsymopsy]
|
Enthusiast
Registered: Mon Feb 13 2012
Posts: 204
Loc: New York USA
|
I do see the problems involved. BTW, I must clarify here that I didn't mean that a Champ might be moved out of the Champ division against his will. He has earned the designation and deserves it. But let's say that a frustrated Champ voluntarily chose to move down from the Champ designation. In that case, as someone said, he might dominate his new division. That doesn't seem fair either. This issue sounds like a Catch-22. I'm sorry I mentioned it. LOL Interesting conversation, nevertheless.  BTW, Salami_swami, thanks for clarifying. ---Sea
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#832100 - Tue Oct 16 2012 06:11 PM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: ssabreman]
|
Forum Champion
Registered: Thu Nov 01 2007
Posts: 6962
Loc: Colorado USA
|
Yes please! I would absolutely love a champ division for mind melt!
_________________________
Subliminal message being sent. Did it work?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#832873 - Fri Oct 19 2012 06:20 PM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: salami_swami]
|
Mainstay
Registered: Sun Jan 31 2010
Posts: 857
Loc: Nebraska USA
|
Put me down as a yea vote on that idea. MM really could use a Champs division.
_________________________
-Dave
"It's not where I've been, fat boy, it's where I'm going." What Tommie Frazier said to Warren Sapp in the 1995 Orange Bowl
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#832876 - Fri Oct 19 2012 06:32 PM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: cubswin2323]
|
Multiloquent
Registered: Sat May 17 2008
Posts: 2207
Loc: Northampton England UK
|
Put me down as a "they must be out of their minds" - don't do it!
_________________________
The Hubble Telescope has just picked up a sound from a fraction of a second before the Big Bang. The sound was "Uh oh".
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#832877 - Fri Oct 19 2012 06:36 PM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: flopsymopsy]
|
Mainstay
Registered: Sun Jan 31 2010
Posts: 857
Loc: Nebraska USA
|
Yep. I'm crazy. Crazy like a fox! LOL
_________________________
-Dave
"It's not where I've been, fat boy, it's where I'm going." What Tommie Frazier said to Warren Sapp in the 1995 Orange Bowl
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#832920 - Fri Oct 19 2012 11:08 PM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: cubswin2323]
|
Forum Champion
Registered: Thu Nov 01 2007
Posts: 6962
Loc: Colorado USA
|
Call me crazy!
_________________________
Subliminal message being sent. Did it work?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#832947 - Sat Oct 20 2012 12:53 AM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: salami_swami]
|
Multiloquent
Registered: Tue Jan 20 2009
Posts: 2356
Loc: Briar Hill Victoria Australia
|
You're crazy.:D
_________________________
(Editor, Humanities, Literature and Books For Children) That's all, folks!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#832960 - Sat Oct 20 2012 02:55 AM
Re: About the CHAMP Classification
[Re: salami_swami]
|
Mainstay
Registered: Tue May 01 2012
Posts: 521
Loc: New York USA
|
Yes please! I would absolutely love a champ division for mind melt! I would like that, too!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|