#1177964 - Sun Oct 15 2017 04:03 AM
InstQuiz Games
|
Prolific
Registered: Tue Aug 03 2010
Posts: 1285
Loc: Coffs Harbour NSW Australia
|
I noticed on the site tonight that the InstaQuiz Games are to be retired from October.
Won't that make the Twin Challenge very difficult to achieve when we get it in our Daily Challenges Game?
_________________________
"Beauty is fleeting, its memory timeless"...Eidhneach O'Diomasaigh
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178025 - Sun Oct 15 2017 04:52 PM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Mainstay
Registered: Sat May 25 2013
Posts: 597
Loc: Texas USA
|
Instaquiz is a dinosaur which is unnecessary for the Twin Challenge or any other point precision challenge, for that matter. There are numerous ways of achieving point precision, which have been discussed numerous times in the FT boards. Using Topic Mashes (or Mixed Quizzes, if you must), any FT point score from 1 point (yes, exactly one point) to 160 or so points can easily be achieved. Say you need 133 points to complete a Twin Challenge. Multiply the desired score by 6. In this case, 133 times 6 is 798. Pick a Topic Mash game that is easy for you. Take your time and get the first eight questions right for, say, 762 points (for example). You need 36 more points. On the ninth question, wait until the timer is at 36 seconds (or 37 or 38 if your reflexes are a bit slow) to click submit. You can be off your target a couple of points either way and still make it because of rounding, so any score from 796-800 will work in this instance. Let's say you were one second off and are now at 799 points. Deliberately miss the last question. You will be awarded exactly 133 FT points for your Topic Mash score of 799, which will allow you to successfully complete your Twin Challenge.
I consider the Twin Challenge one of the easiest of the Difficult Daily Challenges, and have never had problems completing it, even before Topic Mashes were created, as there are several other approaches to point precision. And I have *never* used Instaquiz for point precision. Instaquiz is unnecessary and should be retired. Retiring it will have no appreciable effect on players' abilities to complete the Twin Challenge or any other point precision Challenge. They will simply use alternative methods, which are actually more effective than Instaquiz ever was at achieving point precision.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178041 - Sun Oct 15 2017 09:48 PM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Prolific
Registered: Tue Aug 03 2010
Posts: 1285
Loc: Coffs Harbour NSW Australia
|
Oh blow that. I just won't play that challenge any more.
_________________________
"Beauty is fleeting, its memory timeless"...Eidhneach O'Diomasaigh
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178047 - Mon Oct 16 2017 02:07 AM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Mainstay
Registered: Sat Jul 17 2004
Posts: 727
Loc: Essex UK
|
I accept that if the site is changing then Instaquiz has to go. However, We each have our preferred methods of achieving the twin challenge and just because one person chooses a different (and somewhat convoluted method) I don't think it justifies saying that Instaquiz is unnecessary.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178048 - Mon Oct 16 2017 04:29 AM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Moderator
Registered: Sat Jun 10 2006
Posts: 3908
Loc: Merseyside UK
|
I always use Instaquiz too. I've never got to grips with the method described above and by Wes. I tend to go for the 'trial and error' approach - mostly the latter.
_________________________
Editor - Animals & Sci/Tech
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178049 - Mon Oct 16 2017 04:42 AM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Mainstay
Registered: Wed Jul 16 2014
Posts: 777
Loc: Utah USA
|
I think the mash method of exact score dialing is only convoluted in explanation not in actual practice, once you do it a time or two. (If ever I start to tell someone how to do it, I provide a disclaimer that they risk dying of boredom just reading the spiel. Brm's explanation is a lot more concise than the way I've been explaining it to folks! But obviously it is still off putting to some even thus abbreviated.)
Seriously though, dont turn what I agree is the easiest, hard challenge on site into a major roadblock if your preferred road is aboat to be bulldozed. If you dont like the math of the mash method, this may sound silly, but try it in reverse; not even for the purpose of score matching at first but just to get more comfortable with the mechanics of it. Look at your game score at the end of a duel and divide by 6. That gives you your FT points earned. If it doesnt divide cleanly, you round to the nearest whole nunber with a .5 rounding up.
To MrNobody's point. I had thought of that and have been casually swiping at "Just a Minute" for about two years now. Between the random time of day issue inherent with the challenge, and the fact that it doesnt work on my phone at all, I only seem to get about one shot at it every 20 days or so. Hopefully I can sneak that one in just under the wire before it is retired, like I did with the Country badge.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178053 - Mon Oct 16 2017 06:53 AM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Mainstay
Registered: Sat Sep 04 2010
Posts: 722
Loc: Alberta Canada
|
Yeah, instaquiz will be finally retired as this current modernization continues. Surely Instaquiz can be converted into a non-flash mode game for us non-rigmarole-inclined players. Please Terry, I beg you...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178058 - Mon Oct 16 2017 07:08 AM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Moderator
Registered: Mon Dec 03 2001
Posts: 20907
Loc: Sydney NSW Australia
|
Another beggar here. Instaquiz was very easy to use, and quite precise.
_________________________
The key to everything is patience. You get the chicken by hatching the egg, not smashing it.
Ex-Editor, Hobbies and Sports, and Forum Moderator
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178060 - Mon Oct 16 2017 08:11 AM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Moderator
Registered: Sat Jun 10 2006
Posts: 3908
Loc: Merseyside UK
|
Thanks for the guidance, answerman. I'm still hoping to avoid it but am prepared to try and learn if forced. We're creatures of habit and hate change.
_________________________
Editor - Animals & Sci/Tech
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178105 - Mon Oct 16 2017 05:49 PM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Prolific
Registered: Tue Aug 03 2010
Posts: 1285
Loc: Coffs Harbour NSW Australia
|
Choices:
1. Instaquiz before it's removed: If you need 2 or 3 points etc to complete the matched scores with your given partner for this challenge, play this lovely easy little game. If you go past your score, wait a couple of minutes and play again - easy as pie. And you have a whole 24 hours in which to do that.
OR:
1. Try the other suggested methods above.
2. Get a degree in mathematics first.
3. Forget the fact that the other suggested methods above rely on finite games - and a stop watch - to reach your score. I.e., you can't go back and try again in a couple of minutes as you can in Instaquiz. Once they're played for the day, that's it.
4. Don't play that particular difficult level daily challenge game at all.
5. Sob.
6. Swop that particular difficult level daily challenge out for another one, even though you really like the challenge of it. It's FUN.
7. Hope Instaquiz can be revived in another form.
_________________________
"Beauty is fleeting, its memory timeless"...Eidhneach O'Diomasaigh
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178108 - Mon Oct 16 2017 07:46 PM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Champion Poster
Registered: Thu Dec 13 2001
Posts: 23115
Loc: Ontario Canada
|
3. Forget the fact that the other suggested methods above rely on finite games - and a stop watch - to reach your score. I.e., you can't go back and try again in a couple of minutes as you can in Instaquiz. Once they're played for the day, that's it. Not so, at least for Gold Members, who can play as many Topic Mashes as they like each day as long as they are in different subcategories. Considering how many subcategories there are, that can't be called "finite". 6. Swop that particular difficult level daily challenge out for another one, even though you really like the challenge of it. It's FUN. This isn't an option for the Twin Challenge, as anything involving a partner isn't eligible to be swopped.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178127 - Mon Oct 16 2017 10:31 PM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Mainstay
Registered: Sat May 25 2013
Posts: 597
Loc: Texas USA
|
I find this discussion amusing, so I will contribute a little more to it. Personally, it wouldn't bother me a bit if a non-flash player method of replacing Instaquiz was developed. I wouldn't use it, of course, because I have played a little bit of Instaquiz (just not for real point precision purposes) and find it quite clunky, which I will elaborate on shortly. But first:
Math degree? Multiplying by six? Really?
But as to the limitations of Instaquiz, let me count the ways:
1) Limited range. Since you can't score more than 30 points on a Gold Instaquiz, you have to be much closer to your target than is needed for other methods.
2) Numbers that aren't multiples of 2 or 3. Say you need 25 points. Playing the 3 point Gold Member Instaquiz by itself won't work, nor the 2 point regular Instaquiz. You need a combination of both, and it may actually take a little math to work it out. Oh, my!
3) Unlike Topic Mashes, you can't control or predict the level of difficulty of Instaquiz questions. I've played a few Instaquizzes. Sometimes the questions are easy, sometimes they are actually surprisingly difficult. If you've already hit your point target and have a few questions left that you need to deliberately miss, difficult questions can be big trouble, since you may accidentally pick the right answer when trying to miss, resulting in you having to quit the game and start over again, or worse yet, overshooting your target.
Too much bother. I have no math degree, but I can multiply by 6 and add and subtract a little. Topic Mashes are more efficient for the purpose. With one Topic Mash, I can easily hit any target from 1 to 160 points. And very easy Topic Mashes are plentiful, even though you only really need one.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178129 - Mon Oct 16 2017 11:32 PM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Prolific
Registered: Tue Aug 03 2010
Posts: 1285
Loc: Coffs Harbour NSW Australia
|
Doesn't matter. You still can play it two minutes later if you don't get it right first time.
And obviously you wouldn't be using instaquiz to get the majority of the points. Only to finesse those last few ones that are the difference.
You're every so superior, Sport, but you DO do lack a sense of humour it seems. I was having a bit of fun with several of my suggestions - including the mathematics degree.
Your way is wayyyy too complicated. Either than, or its your verbosity that's the problem.
To quote you from your initial response from Page 1 of this topic: You gave the example "You need 36 more points. On the ninth question, wait until the timer is at 36 seconds (or 37 or 38 if your reflexes are a bit slow) to click submit. You can be off your target a couple of points either way and still make it because of rounding, so any score from 796-800 will work in this instance. Let's say you were one second off and are now at 799 points. Deliberately miss the last question. You will be awarded exactly 133 FT points for your Topic Mash score of 799, which will allow you to successfully complete your Twin Challenge."
If, on the other hand I needed 36 points, I'd simply play three Quick Questions to get the 30 points - then Instaquiz to get the remaining 6 points. Easy.
Also, I'm surprised you find some of the questions on the Instaquiz "surprisingly difficult". "Oh my", indeed. I don't.
_________________________
"Beauty is fleeting, its memory timeless"...Eidhneach O'Diomasaigh
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178140 - Tue Oct 17 2017 12:48 AM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Moderator
Registered: Sat Jun 10 2006
Posts: 3908
Loc: Merseyside UK
|
To dispute point one made by brm in post number 1178127, I use the instaquiz method much earlier to leave a round number of points I need to get - often when I'm a couple of hundred away, or so. This does leave a bit of room for error, like accidentally choosing a right answer when I wanted a wrong one.
The arithmetic needed to work out what combination of games and questions is needed seems to me to be easier than the mash method, but we're all different.
If the game disappears, I'll adopt answerman's useful suggestion of creating a table of scores.
Now, if someone can find a solution to the problem of trying to twin with someone who isn't aware of the challenge and keeps racking up points while you're trying to match their score, I'm all ears.
_________________________
Editor - Animals & Sci/Tech
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#1178146 - Tue Oct 17 2017 01:48 AM
Re: InstQuiz Games
|
Mainstay
Registered: Wed Jul 16 2014
Posts: 777
Loc: Utah USA
|
Heh. I sort of feel like I have no "right" to complain about that case rossian, as annoying as it is, because of how relatively easy twin is next to most difficult challenges. Eventually they will hit a lull and stay still a minute or two...
Except!...this one time where, I am not kidding, the player was actively taunting. They would do things like sit still a good while, and then rattle off a quick burst of points when I was close to making the match. Once could be coincidence but it happened four or five times.
The only thing that bailed me out was luck. I don't think he (he being my twin and yes, gender was later confirmed that "he" is not a guess or assumption) realized the unpublished and almost seemingly top secret 1000 point bonus for a Crystal Ball win and I just happened to hit the word of the hour during one of his sprint ahead streaks, which just happened to drop me, exactly 200 points behind! I happened to still have brain twist available so I quickly rattled it off and made the match. Was annoying at the time but kind of fun in hindsight.
Haha...and any guesses which hard daily I have today?. Yup..twin. We are about 2200 apart as I write this, having woken up in the middle of the night with no points. I want to play something before passing back out but, its so close to a matching station if I can stand to stay still...
Edited by namrewsna (Tue Oct 17 2017 02:31 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|