I still don't like it.
It is being used for decisions that are given based on opinion. I would rather keep the game simple and leave the points of contention in there. I do like it for anything that is clear cut, like offsides for example. When you are at a game offside decisions are one of the most moaned about things by fans in the stadium (despite the fact that if you are not in line with the offender you simply cannot tell). I'd like to see that eliminated and it is a simple yes or no.
Yesterday we saw Neymar have a penalty claim dismissed when he performed one of the most blatant simulations that I have ever seen. Great, it worked, but video evidence that he threw himself down and he wasn't yellow carded! There are still so many questions? We have some head scratchers too like the Australia penalty against Denmark. There was no way that it was deliberate handball, no way! So because it is being used for an opinion based decision then VAR actually gave Australia a penalty and goal in that game that they should not have had.
As for Maradona, no tech was needed on that day just a linesman capable of helping his Referee. Very clear view from that position but he never flagged. VAR in 1986 would have chalked off Maradona's hand of God and true it is hard to argue against wanting injustices like that overturned but still I'd prefer to go on without. I love the game, faults and all.
Would VAR and goal line technology mean that England never won the World Cup in 66? Or one I actually remember, Spain's goal in the Euro 96 quarter final that was ruled out offside would have stood? I know, I know, I'm not actually trying to argue that we shouldn't use VAR because we have benefitted from poor decisions. By the same token I don't think it's right to advocate it based on emotive incidents.
I do think that, from what I've seen, referees are officiating games slightly differently with VAR over their shoulder too. I think they feel like they should allow things to play out a bit more than usual as it can be reviewed afterwards if necessary? Anyone else feel that? The theory being that if you whistle and stop the play then if you're wrong it is too late for the team to continue with their advantage? So maybe the number of refereeing 'errors' is being contributed to by hat uncertainty? I don't know. Maybe you're just right samak. Overall, I won't lose any sleep over VARs inclusion in my sport. It's not that big of a deal. The game is the same, no better no worse really so I don't mind but if I was the one with the choice of whether to have VAR then we would not have it except for offside decisions and the existing goal line tech.
Here's something interesting though. Anybody know a World Cup moment that was allegedly the first use of 'VAR'? How about the World Cup final 2006? According to Raymond Domenech who was manager of France at the time none of the four officials had seen Zidane's headbutt on Materazzi and he was stood next to the fourth official when he saw the replay of the incident and then alerted the referee as to what had happened and Zidane was sent off. Could be true? I remember a minute or so of total confusion as to what had happened.