My wife was watching "The Bridges of Madison County" the other night when she suddenly asked, "Why did they build roofs over bridges?"
In my infinite knowledge of all things mechanical and construction-type stuff, I replied, "I dunno."
I did a web search and found out that thousands of covered bridges were built in the 19th century in Canada and the U.S. Most of the sites showed barn-like structures, complete with windows, interior walkways, and hand rails, spanning a creek or narrow river.
The ends of the structures were open to horse-drawn wagons and such.
The web sites gave two reasons for covering bridges: (1) to keep snow, rain and such from weathering the supporting timbers. Apparently, an uncovered bridge would last about 10 years and a covered one maybe 50 years.
(2) Horses were reluctant and had a propensity to bolt if driven over an open bridge with flowing water beneath. Covered, the bridge looked like a familiar barn to them and they didn't spook.
I don't entirely believe either answer. Timber was plentiful, close by, and labor was cheap. It would be just as cost effective to not build a structure over them.
Horses have been ridden or pulling wagons over open bridges for centuries, so neither answer is particularly compelling.
Do any of you agree/disagree? Do you have a better answer?
_________________________
Some days it just doesn't seem worth trying to chew through the restraints.