I'm probably wondering about things in a "sideways" direction here (what else is new

?) but, after watching all the gruesome coverage last night on this, I was slightly unsettled by more than that this was a horrific event, full of pointless violence, shock waves from a rage that soundly defies what rage even stands for, another example of "
is anywhere, anything, any daily act as we act it, safe?". The combination of grief, shock, human nature, rock solid fear and the like causes us to instinctively "act funny" in the shadow of these horrors, I think. But I, for one, was
really daunted by that press conference. The dean was there, (the police [chief, I think], too). At that point they were still notifying parents/families of victims. No names had been offered of those involved. Speculations as to motives were running wild (I thought one more time how odd it seems when we waste a lot of energy assgning
reasonable motives to a lunatic...by definition, I don't think lunatics work using understandable motives - but I'm never sure

). Clearly, though, those school/local officials were taking a SERIOUS beating! There are so many questions here that
need answers. Or, if no good answers are available, the questions need raised anyway. We NEED to talk about real (and not just discussed/"what if?") public security, both in colleges and elsewhere. We NEED to talk about gun control and
especially how it is or should be viewed in tandem with mental health. We NEED to get a substantially better grip on that, in unexpected matters such as this one, the left hand knows what the right hand is doing. Even though we should be wired to do it better in these times, we NEED to presuppose just how bad things can become before they become that way. These things are mighty important issues, but I (personally) believe they should be dealt with in a more dignified and sensible order than they were yesterday. At the press conference the "officials" were being soundly pummeled (pretty much blamed) for the death of 30+ people. Not exactly surprising, I guess, for the media to do that - but exactly what service was being done in the process? The locals were just as rattled by this [OK, probably MUCH more so] as much as you or I but yet they had to stand there, while the wounds were still so fresh as to not have been fully identified as to who they belonged to just yet, being no more or less in the face of a brutal firing squad. It always makes me wonder (I've seen that sort of thing happen SO MANY times before) ~ "Whew. Now we have someone to hold accountable. Someone to blame. Carry on, kids.
This problem can now be almost safely filed away for now..." To me, the one accountable is the nutcase with the gun. If negligence was in place in key regions, let that be worked out later. It seemed to me the order of reactions AFTER the event was downright unnecessary, almost cruel and hardly purposeful.
Maybe it's just me. I was raised in a time when, at school as a kid, we had "drills" as to what to do in the case of a nuclear war. It seems funny now, but it was serious business then. What were our instructions? 'Get under your desk, and get under there in a hurry!' We all know, now, that that riickety little desk wouldn't have helped much in terms of sparing our fledgeling lives against radiation. But it DID make us feel a bit empowered to think so. It seems to me, though, that if the current mindset were in place back then that is in place now, we'd all be much more immediately concerned (in the case of that threatened "bomb", were it to drop) with nailing the Desk Companies for
not making our assigned spots in our classroom out of substantial enough lead.
Just my thoughts, though. I'm sure they don't reflect those of the majority on this one...