Ah, contraire to "time wasting", mountaingoat

! These are the sorts of qestions that butter the popcorn here at FunTrivia

! I was especially intriqued since (as an American, especially) I wasn't sure about the answers
at all. The 'swinging of arms' might take a more thorough search but I did find this on Wikipedia in regards to the order of final arguments in court. As has been proven, time and again, Wiki is not always the most reliable card in the deck, but it sounds pretty much right (to my NOT legally trained self, at least):
Quote:
The plaintiff is generally entitled to open the argument. The defendant usually goes second. The plaintiff or prosecution is usually then permitted a final rebuttal argument. In some jurisdictions, however, this form is condensed, and the prosecution or plaintiff goes second, after the defense, with no rebuttals. Either party may waive their opportunity to present a closing argument.
Does that help? At all? I'll have a look for the "soldiers marching" details but that might be a bit more daunting. Or, more than likely, someone here will know without even having to look it up. Very eclectic pools of knowledge around here ...