Registered: Thu Sep 30 1999
Posts: 1979
Loc: Shangri-La USA
Just a thought (nuts as it may seem)....how about 7 & 8-letter words stay, but you can change 2 of the letters? Might see some pretty huge scores!
BL
------------------ Forgiveness is the fragrance the violet sheds on the heel that has crushed it. ....Mark Twain
_________________________ The stupid neither forgive nor forget; The naïve forgive and forget; The wise forgive, but do not forget. ....[i]Thomas Szasz</I]
#65378 - Mon Feb 12 200110:22 AMRe: Scramblings - The Sequel !!
Anonymous
No longer registered
How about making the 7 and 8 letter words optional on those days, but you can go back to 5 and 4 if you don't have a 7 or 8 entry? A chance for extra points, but not cancelling everything out if you can't do it?
Registered: Tue Jan 04 2000
Posts: 2339
Loc: Wichita Kansas USA
7 and 8 letters will make the game challanging, which means more fun. If it's too easy, it's not fun. Let's leave it stand this week and see how it goes. It if don't work out you can go back to the 5/4 next week.
_________________________ Venture into my realm at Ft. Sage
#65380 - Mon Feb 12 200110:30 AMRe: Scramblings - The Sequel !!
Sypher Moderator
Registered: Thu Sep 30 1999
Posts: 16542
Loc: East London England UK
Baglady's idea is fine but Mamaja's idea would be a nightmare to score...What if someone done a 4 letter...than What ? You can't just add 4 letters of your own choice !!
So far it is 5 YAYS for smaller entries 2 votes that I'm not sure of...(Baglady and Mamaja) 1 vote for 7/8 words
------------------ ...and I Guess That's Why They Call It The Blues !!
[This message has been edited by Sypher (edited 02-12-2001).]
_________________________ I'll get enough sleep when I'm dead !!
#65382 - Tue Feb 13 200112:09 AMRe: Scramblings - The Sequel !!
Anonymous
No longer registered
Sorry, Sypher, I think I suffered more flatulence of the brain - I know my idea would never work. I was thinking of how easy it might be if you had the right lead in, but I never thought about what to do when it came to adding the new letters. I can go with whatever you all decide. I'll lose just the same!!!
------------------ Sieze the moment. Remember all those women on the Titanic who waved off the dessert cart. Erma Bombeck
#65383 - Mon Feb 12 200111:05 PMRe: Scramblings - The Sequel !!
CellarDoor
Multiloquent
Registered: Sat Feb 12 2000
Posts: 4894
Loc: Seattle Washington USA
Silly question, but since we're getting into longer words ... both the British & the American spellings for words like color/colour, rationalize/rationalise, defense/defence, etc., are valid, right?
_________________________ Just because there's twilight doesn't mean we can't tell the difference between night and day
#65384 - Tue Feb 13 200102:06 AMRe: Scramblings - The Sequel !!
Sypher Moderator
Registered: Thu Sep 30 1999
Posts: 16542
Loc: East London England UK
Well, considering some words have already been used that are spelt the American way and not the British way...I will let it slide. Is their any specific Aussie way ? lol
_________________________ I'll get enough sleep when I'm dead !!
Registered: Tue Jan 04 2000
Posts: 2339
Loc: Wichita Kansas USA
Sorry Sypher, have to challange your entry of YENTZ for today. I couldn't find it on any web dictionary. And, they do list "Yiddish" slang. BTW, isn't Yiddish a foreign language?
_________________________ Venture into my realm at Ft. Sage
#65386 - Tue Feb 13 200107:11 AMRe: Scramblings - The Sequel !!
Sypher Moderator
Registered: Thu Sep 30 1999
Posts: 16542
Loc: East London England UK
The first thing it saids is US Slang...Yiddish was in brackets. It can still be used in a common sentance, so it is not outdated like some of the entries of past.
As for dictionaries.....we have several sources to pick from now. It is listed in the OED...it is not obselete or french like some of my old entries. If I thought I was going to lose a challenge I would have never posted it...(there was an simplier word to use)
_________________________ I'll get enough sleep when I'm dead !!
#65387 - Tue Feb 13 200107:23 AMRe: Scramblings - The Sequel !!
Sypher Moderator
Registered: Thu Sep 30 1999
Posts: 16542
Loc: East London England UK
This is what the OED has under Yentz...
Yentz(jEnts), v. U.S. Slang. [Yiddish, f. yentzen to copulate]
trans. To Cheat, to swindle (see also quot. 1939). Also fig. Cf. screw v. 6d, 13. 1930 Amer.Mercury Dec. 458/2 Yentz, to cheat. 'They try to yentz me out of me end.' 1939Amer. Speech XIV. 240/2 To yentz, to cheat; to fornicate. 1969 S. J. Perelman in Holiday Mar. 104/4 The faintness one characteristically experiences on discovering that he has been yentzed. 1978 J. Krantz Scruples x. 276 'I don't yentz them,' Maggie explained, Coca-Cola-colored eyes all innocence, 'they just yentz themselves and I try not to run out of tape.'
That is everything the OED says...I too looked up that Yiddish site and found Yentzen, but it is a verb and Yentz does exist.
------------------ ...and I Guess That's Why They Call It The Blues !!
_________________________ I'll get enough sleep when I'm dead !!
#65388 - Tue Feb 13 200110:34 AMRe: Scramblings - The Sequel !!
Anonymous
No longer registered
Lord, the education I'm getting on this stuff. I thought I knew every slang for "Yentz" - even studied Russian just so I would understand someone's profanity. But you learn something new every day!!!!! I'm blushing!!!
------------------ Sieze the moment. Remember all those women on the Titanic who waved off the dessert cart. Erma Bombeck
Registered: Tue Jan 04 2000
Posts: 2339
Loc: Wichita Kansas USA
But, I thought it was decided that if the word wasn't in the on-line dictionay sites, it would be invalid because not everybody has the OED. You asked for the web sites to impliment this rule. How are we going to check if we can't find it on the web? The word "yentz" wasn't in google search except as somebody's last name.
If what I say is true, then "WESTY' wouldn't be a valid word either.
_________________________ Venture into my realm at Ft. Sage
#65390 - Tue Feb 13 200110:49 AMRe: Scramblings - The Sequel !!
Sypher Moderator
Registered: Thu Sep 30 1999
Posts: 16542
Loc: East London England UK
I agree with you on that a search for Yentz only brought up people's last name... As for on-line dictionaries....they are the main source, and I did say they had to make sense and be able to be used in a common sentance. Yentz still gets used to this day...
As for 'Westy'...it can be found on-line in the http://www.onelook.com/ site. Again, this word is also slang.
As to the challenge, it wont count as a loss or gain of points !!
_________________________ I'll get enough sleep when I'm dead !!
#65392 - Tue Feb 13 200107:23 PMRe: Scramblings - The Sequel !!
Pinhead
Multiloquent
Registered: Thu Sep 30 1999
Posts: 3185
Loc: The Dark Side of the Moon...
Ok, these are my thoughts. I don't think the OED should used at all, since all of us can't use it, and it seems to me, whoever uses it definitely has the advantage.
I agree with Sage to use an online source that is available to everyone.
Also, those of us who have WebTV can't data base woids and I ain't going back to the first game and hand write out all the woids, just to make sure I don't have a repeat..LOL
It's hard enough just finding a woid.. Soooo, I'll probably be on your repeat list more than once...LOL
------------------ "What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is being very wasteful. How true that is."............. Dan Quayle
[This message has been edited by Pinhead (edited 02-13-2001).]
#65393 - Tue Feb 13 200107:31 PMRe: Scramblings - The Sequel !!
Anonymous
No longer registered
I already went through and wrote down all the words...it only took me about 15 minutes...after that its just daily upkeep..I do like the new rule on use of words already used...if you want triple points then take the time to do it...
#65395 - Tue Feb 13 200108:50 PMRe: Scramblings - The Sequel !!
Anonymous
No longer registered
don't know if I want to make it a challenge or not perhaps its too late...I looked for 45 minutes to find a source online with rolex in it (to use for myself....not for the challenge)...I couldn't find it anywhere...I know what it is...we all do...but does it count since its a proper word...its not in dictionary.com, merriam-webster ,or my lowly ole oxford dictionary of modern english...I guess its not a challenge since I don't want to lose my points but can we have clarification on brand names....