#70828 - Tue Dec 11 2001 04:52 PM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Prolific
Registered: Tue Oct 02 2001
Posts: 1817
Loc: Brooklyn New York USA
|
I liked "Killing Me Softly" (the Fugees) better the second time around.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70829 - Tue Dec 11 2001 05:29 PM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Prolific
Registered: Fri Jul 27 2001
Posts: 1235
Loc: Glasgow UK
|
There's a fabulous version of "We Have All The Time In The World" by My Bloody Valentine which is, amazingly enough, even more blissful than the original and Bjork has a version of another Bond tune, "You Only Live Twice" which I prefer to the original, but only marginally. I'll think of more in a while no doubt.
_________________________
Das ist gut, c'est fantastique, hit me, hit me, hit me!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70830 - Tue Dec 11 2001 05:43 PM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Prolific
Registered: Fri Jul 27 2001
Posts: 1235
Loc: Glasgow UK
|
The Damned covered The MC5's "Looking At You" in a mighty punk stylee, much better than the original, and a MIGHTY version of Jefferson Airplane's "White Rabbit". Good chaps!!
_________________________
Das ist gut, c'est fantastique, hit me, hit me, hit me!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70831 - Tue Dec 11 2001 05:47 PM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Forum Champion
Registered: Tue Oct 02 2001
Posts: 8311
Loc: Melbourne VIC Australia
|
..this is not an easy admission for me to make, but Ray Charles has recorded the definitive version of "Eleanor Rigby"! I also think that Nick Cave's cover of "All Tomorrow's Parties" may not necessarily better, but it's just as good!! They Might Be Giants "Istanbul (Not Constantinople)". Why did I put that in? Because I can!! 
_________________________
I'm a maverick, I don't play by the rules you choose to live by.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70833 - Tue Dec 11 2001 05:56 PM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Forum Champion
Registered: Tue Oct 02 2001
Posts: 8311
Loc: Melbourne VIC Australia
|
I have to agree with you there (much as it irks me  ). I don't know why, but Nick Cave just seems to have a knack for cover! Having said that, most of his original stuff is mind-blowing in it's own right.
_________________________
I'm a maverick, I don't play by the rules you choose to live by.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70834 - Tue Dec 11 2001 08:41 PM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Enthusiast
Registered: Wed Dec 05 2001
Posts: 285
Loc: San Francisco California USA
|
I like INOJ's version of "Time After Time" better than Cyndi Lauper's version. I also like INOJ's cover of "Love You Down" by Ready For The World. Both versions are great though. The original by Ready For The World is more of a slow song, while INOJ's version is a slow song combined with a dance song
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70835 - Wed Dec 12 2001 04:32 AM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Multiloquent
Registered: Sun Sep 30 2001
Posts: 2521
Loc: Norwich England UK
|
Walk on By - The StranglersNo........not just because I'm a Stranglers worshipper. It's a classic song by Dionne Warwick, but The Stranglers version is faster and more fun to listen to. With an inspired instrumental break of some 5 minutes, slap bang in the middle of it! Two completely different songs, in reality. wez  Whoops!...........forgot to mention 'Tragedy' by Steps. Purely and simply because I despise the Bee Gees, with a passion verging on the hysterical! Clive Anderson rocks!  [ 12-12-2001: Message edited by: wez ]
_________________________
"I'll be back before you can say antidisestablishmentarianism!"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70838 - Fri Dec 14 2001 09:52 AM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Prolific
Registered: Fri Jul 27 2001
Posts: 1235
Loc: Glasgow UK
|
Having consulted The Book Of Things That Should And Should Not Be, I'm afraid, Tanzen, that it doesn't count. Consider your copy book blotted, and go stand in the corner!!! Unless, it says here, the band is either Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Titch or Chickory Tip. You should read this book, it's "da bomb". 
_________________________
Das ist gut, c'est fantastique, hit me, hit me, hit me!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70839 - Fri Dec 14 2001 01:14 PM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Multiloquent
Registered: Mon Jun 25 2001
Posts: 2542
Loc: Los Angeles California USA
|
I still like the Beatles version of Eleanor Rigby. What is the most covered song of all time?
_________________________
Smile, it makes people wonder what you are thinking.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70840 - Fri Dec 14 2001 03:18 PM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Multiloquent
Registered: Sun Sep 30 2001
Posts: 2521
Loc: Norwich England UK
|
quote: Originally posted by Lord Andry: What is the most covered song of all time?
Talking about the Beatles..................This is, with some 2,500 versions. Yesterday - The Beatles wez 
_________________________
"I'll be back before you can say antidisestablishmentarianism!"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70841 - Fri Dec 14 2001 06:25 PM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Multiloquent
Registered: Mon Jun 25 2001
Posts: 2542
Loc: Los Angeles California USA
|
very impressive...did you know that? or did you have to look it up? I learned it a coupla years ago while watching a VH1 special
_________________________
Smile, it makes people wonder what you are thinking.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70842 - Fri Dec 14 2001 07:22 PM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Forum Champion
Registered: Tue Apr 17 2001
Posts: 7306
Loc: Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
|
Gob does a great version of "Paint it Black" by the Stones. Elvis Costello doing "Good Year for the Roses" is great too. The Ramones covered many a Beach Boys song, I like all of them better by The Ramones. By the way, SFA, thanks for mentioning "Gimmie Shelter" by Sisters of Mercy. I just downloaded it, it's fantastic!! [ 12-14-2001: Message edited by: IndieQueen ]
_________________________
[color:"purple"] "One of the best features of Forums is that they allow people to parade their monumental stupidity, their hang-ups, their little prejudices in public." [/color]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70843 - Sun Dec 16 2001 12:42 AM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Participant
Registered: Sat Nov 17 2001
Posts: 24
Loc: Minnesota, USA
|
A GREAT remake is Angel From Montgomery by Susan Tedeschi, originnaly done by (I think it was John Prine).
_________________________
Are you gonna bark all day little doggy ? Or, are you gonna bite ? ©Mr. Blonde
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70844 - Sun Dec 16 2001 02:17 PM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Multiloquent
Registered: Sun Dec 02 2001
Posts: 2224
Loc: North Carolina USA
|
Tanzen, Since I come from an area where Charlie Daniels has always been Highly Respected and Wildly Popular, I am taking your pub band's verison as a real international Tribute. Unless er, you all don't do it say a Rap-Remix, do you?
_________________________
I dont think we're in Kansas anymore, Toto
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70845 - Sun Dec 16 2001 05:44 PM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Forum Champion
Registered: Tue Oct 02 2001
Posts: 8311
Loc: Melbourne VIC Australia
|
Actually, it's an Irish band - so they already have the whole violin thing sorted out! I think it does the original justice, maybe it's just my preference of live music? Maybe this subject should have been put in the controversial issues sectoin (I have the strangest feeling I'm gonna get my head kicked in...)? And for the record, I lurve the Beatles "Eleanor Rigby", but Ray Charles just add a bit of edge to it. That bit of hopeless anxiety that I think the song needs... ..And just to stir the pot further (ah, we all need a hobby!) I'm going to add "Girl, You'll Be A Woman Soon" (Urge Overkill)... PS - Where do I get this "The Book Of Things That Should And Should Not Be", My little Animal friend? 
_________________________
I'm a maverick, I don't play by the rules you choose to live by.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#70846 - Tue Dec 18 2001 12:58 AM
Re: A Remake Better Than The Original?
|
Prolific
Registered: Fri Jul 27 2001
Posts: 1235
Loc: Glasgow UK
|
Bargain Books, Byres Road, Glasgow, £5.99. Though it may be sold out by now! 
_________________________
Das ist gut, c'est fantastique, hit me, hit me, hit me!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|