#811041 - Thu Jul 26 2012 11:32 PM
Re: Olympics!
|
Moderator
Registered: Thu Sep 30 1999
Posts: 12593
Loc: Kowloon Tong Hong Kong
|
I am excited beyond control! Wowee, we get to see the opening ceremony tomorrow at 6 oclock am. There are a lot of people here who are muttering that they believe the Olympics will not succeed (ie, make money) in London, not like the wonderful perfect Beijing ones that made so many billion yuan profit. I thank God I can watch it on BBC and it will be a huge success for the right and real reasons, the joy of competing and meeting people from all over the world. Not the money it makes or not.
_________________________
Wandering aimlessly through FT since 1999.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#811097 - Fri Jul 27 2012 05:38 AM
Re: Olympics!
|
Moderator
Registered: Tue May 15 2001
Posts: 14384
Loc: Australia
|
I am excited beyond control! Wowee, we get to see the opening ceremony tomorrow at 6 oclock am. I'd say there will be a fair bit of alarm setting over the next couple of weeks! 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#811113 - Fri Jul 27 2012 10:30 AM
Re: Olympics!
|
Enthusiast
Registered: Thu May 10 2012
Posts: 346
Loc: Norfolk England UK
|
Maybe someone on here can tell me why the flame ever went to Dublin, I have not got a sensible answer off anyone else.
It's like the USA getting the Games and letting the torch go to a City in Canada for the day
Edited by pmarney (Fri Jul 27 2012 10:34 AM)
_________________________
I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#811172 - Fri Jul 27 2012 05:45 PM
Re: Olympics!
|
Moderator
Registered: Tue May 15 2001
Posts: 14384
Loc: Australia
|
Very British. As one commentator said about the rehearsals, "Magnificently British and decidedly bonkers". And anyone who can get the Queen to be a Bond girl deserves a gold medal, lolol. haha - it was very cool ... and the whole ceremony, as you said, was very British .. which is what the whole point of the openeing ceremony is. I wonder, when it ws announced that london had the Games, if Paul McCartney just sat back and waited for his call. How could he have NOT been in it? 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#811193 - Sat Jul 28 2012 12:38 AM
Re: Olympics!
|
Participant
Registered: Wed Dec 28 2011
Posts: 38
Loc: Virgin Islands USA
|
Maybe someone on here can tell me why the flame ever went to Dublin, I have not got a sensible answer off anyone else.
It's like the USA getting the Games and letting the torch go to a City in Canada for the day The host city determines the how/where/why and sympolic route the torch goes. I would think that if the U.S. hosted the games, and the torch went to a neighboring country, it would be interpretated as a kind, neighborly gesture. What's wrong with the flame going to Dublin for a bit?
Edited by ITSOUNO11 (Sat Jul 28 2012 02:10 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#811195 - Sat Jul 28 2012 01:45 AM
Re: Olympics!
|
Moderator
Registered: Sat Jun 10 2006
Posts: 3908
Loc: Merseyside UK
|
I thought the cauldron was brilliant and I'm still stunned that Her Majesty agreed to that film.
_________________________
Editor - Animals & Sci/Tech
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#811196 - Sat Jul 28 2012 02:04 AM
Re: Olympics!
|
Mainstay
Registered: Sat Apr 25 2009
Posts: 877
Loc: Minnesota USA
|
Like some of you others, I thought the cauldron was amazing - all of the nations coming together to make the flame. That was the highlight for me. (Mr. Bean was a close second, lol) I was waiting to see Guor Marial, the South Sudan marathon runner that is going to run under the Olympic flag, during the parade of nations. I didn't realize until afterwards that he wasn't in London yet...waiting in Arizona for his paperwork to clear.  I really hope he does well in the marathon.
Edited by pyonir (Sat Jul 28 2012 02:06 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#811280 - Sat Jul 28 2012 10:33 AM
Re: Olympics!
|
Moderator
Registered: Wed Mar 15 2000
Posts: 16214
Loc: The Delta Quadrant
|
NBC not only chopped the Ceremony up for viewers in the USA so they could see some commercials - I'm sure you all wanted to see those - but they also cut out the athletes' pledge (rather key event for the Olympics?) AND they deleted the memorial segment to victims of 7/7. Nice. !! I always knew there was a reason I liked the Canadian coverage better... NBC always seems to chop it up and insert annoying bits.
_________________________
"Without the darkness, how would we see the light?" ~ Tuvok
Editor for Television Category
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#811314 - Sat Jul 28 2012 05:15 PM
Re: Olympics!
|
Mainstay
Registered: Sat Apr 25 2009
Posts: 877
Loc: Minnesota USA
|
If I had a choice, I'd only watch the NBC coverage during basketball games. During the opening ceremony, they were talking about how good the cover of "Come Together" by the Arctic Monkeys was during rehearsals...and proceeded to talk during almost the whole thing. If it's so great, then let. us. hear. it. The commentary annoyed me to no end. I would have muted it, but then would have missed out on the music and at least some of the singing.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#811368 - Sat Jul 28 2012 09:17 PM
Re: Olympics!
|
Moderator
Registered: Tue May 15 2001
Posts: 14384
Loc: Australia
|
We had Eddie McGuire doing ours (And Eddie McGuire is Eddie McGuire's biggest fan) and he managed to tell us that it was the Queen's first acting role before she appeared on screen therefore ruining that surprise. And it was all so "wooden" how everything was said - left no doubt that it was all read from a script.
But still - I would prefer that to not having it live. I remember from the last Olympics that it was the same too. If something isn't live, even just my weekly football game, I prefer not to watch it at all .. I listen to the live radio coverage or look up the result on the 'net but I'm not watching a delayed event just so they can put ads in.
(so there channel nine!!)
Edited by Copago (Sat Jul 28 2012 09:18 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|