#833283 - Sun Oct 21 2012 01:06 PM
More than one
|
Administrator
Registered: Sat Mar 29 2003
Posts: 16595
Loc: Western Canada
|
I tend to read, most of the time, two books at a time. One on my iPod, while I do housework, work out, and walk the dog. Another in print. Sometimes I also have one going in the car on CD, and may even have a paperback in my purse while my 'big' book is on the nightstand.
I've always been a 'more than one book at a time' reader, since I learned to read (drove my mom crazy), so I find it's not confusing as I'm so used to it. Sometimes it sets up interesting resonances, though - Agatha Christie and Jane Austen on country house parties, for example. A book written in the 1850s and one written in the 2010s but set in the 1850s. A crime novel from the point of view of the cops, while reading a different crime novel from the point of view of the criminals.
One thing I have noticed is that simultaneous reading shows up a poor writer. I can read good writers with very different styles, at the same time - Thomas Hardy and Harlan Ellison, for example - and they both come out looking good. However, if I'm reading something good I can't at the same time read a pot-boiler that would otherwise strike me as readable if not wonderful. I can reasonably enjoy, oh, Mary Higgins Clark, if that's all there is to read, but not at the same time I'm reading something more artful.
I'm sure I'm not the only simultaneous reader out there - what's your experience?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#833292 - Sun Oct 21 2012 02:14 PM
Re: More than one
|
Prolific
Registered: Wed Jun 27 2012
Posts: 1850
Loc: Ohio USA
|
I read multiple books at once. I'll start one, find another one, put the first one down, then come back to it. Right now I'm in the middle of several novels. I just read whichever one I'm in the mood for when I feel like reading. At the moment, I'm partway through "The Help" by Kathryn Stockett, "The Lightning Thief" by Rick Riordan, "High Five" by Janet Evanovich, and "Les Miserables" by Victor Hugo, all at varying stages of completion.
_________________________
This is not a signature...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#833431 - Mon Oct 22 2012 12:46 PM
Re: More than one
|
Star Poster
Registered: Thu Oct 16 2003
Posts: 10984
Loc: Burlington Ontario Canada
|
I usually have two going - one on my Kindle and one in paperback because I don't trust myself with my Kindle in the bath! I've got "Mystery" by Kellerman going on the Kindle and am still struggling with "Brother Odd" in paperback. Almost done and it's getting almost interesting!
_________________________
Editor: Movies/Celebrities/Crosswords
"To insult someone we call him 'bestial'. For deliberate cruelty and nature, 'human' might be the greater insult." - Isaac Asimov
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#834943 - Sun Oct 28 2012 03:55 PM
Re: More than one
|
Mainstay
Registered: Tue Mar 09 2010
Posts: 634
Loc: Pennsylvania USA
|
I read two or three at a time: one on cassette tape, one on digital cartridge, and one in Braille. Right now, those three are “Sum of All Fears” by Tom Clancy (cassette), “Daughters-in-law” by Joanna Trollope (cartridge), and “The Kite Runner” by Khaled Hosseini. I normally read or listen tone based on what I’m in the mood for.
_________________________
(1) Young I may be, but even young people are entitled to their opinions. (2)Attempting to silence me doesn't hurt me, but the silencer. (3) I must remain true to myself.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#834952 - Sun Oct 28 2012 05:07 PM
Re: More than one
|
Mainstay
Registered: Sat Apr 25 2009
Posts: 877
Loc: Minnesota USA
|
I'm a one at a time reader. If I try to read two or more, I become disinterested in whatever book interests me the least and read the interesting one to completion. If I find the book dull it usually takes me a lot longer to read it because I slog through it and don't get anxious to read, so it may take up to a month for me to finish it. If it's a great book, I can read it in a couple days.
I've also never tried an audio book. Not sure why...probably from lack of an ipod or portable device in which to listen on.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|