FREE! Click here to Join FunTrivia. Thousands of games, quizzes, and lots more!
Quiz about Types of Sources for History
Quiz about Types of Sources for History

Types of Sources for History Trivia Quiz


This is about the characteristics of things like primary, secondary, reliable and unreliable sources. It does *not* tell you where to find materials for quizzes.

A multiple-choice quiz by bloomsby. Estimated time: 4 mins.
  1. Home
  2. »
  3. Quizzes
  4. »
  5. History Trivia
  6. »
  7. Specialized History

Author
bloomsby
Time
4 mins
Type
Multiple Choice
Quiz #
353,492
Updated
Dec 03 21
# Qns
10
Difficulty
Average
Avg Score
7 / 10
Plays
654
Awards
Top 35% Quiz
Last 3 plays: genoveva (6/10), Guest 35 (7/10), Guest 82 (7/10).
- -
Question 1 of 10
1. In science and scholarship the terms 'primary' and 'secondary' have the same meanings in all areas of knowledge.


Question 2 of 10
2. A primary source is often described as a document, artefact or other object or record produced 'at the time'. Which of these would NOT count as a primary source for events in 17th century England? Hint


Question 3 of 10
3. Which of these would NOT normally be regarded as a primary source? Hint


Question 4 of 10
4. Secondary sources are books and articles derived from primary sources. They interpret and analyse. Some secondary works are 'peer reviewed', that is, they are read and assessed by colleagues of the author.

If a peer reviewed work is accepted for publication, what does that mean over and above the obvious fact that it conforms to academic norms?
Hint


Question 5 of 10
5. Sometimes a secondary work may be treated as a primary work. In what circumstances, if any, would a book on the Crusades published in 1860 be a primary source? Hint


Question 6 of 10
6. Generally speaking, what kind of source is an autobiography? Hint


Question 7 of 10
7. What kind of source is an article in an encyclopedia or comparable reference work? Hint


Question 8 of 10
8. Primary sources are more reliable than secondary sources.


Question 9 of 10
9. A friend says to you, 'My grandfather's an expert on World War II. He took part in the Normandy landings'. What is this man an expert on *simply by virtue of having taken part in the D-Day landings*? Hint


Question 10 of 10
10. When writing academic essays or other assignments one must give details of all sources. Why? (Please read all the options before answering). Hint



(Optional) Create a Free FunTrivia ID to save the points you are about to earn:

arrow Select a User ID:
arrow Choose a Password:
arrow Your Email:




Most Recent Scores
Mar 27 2024 : genoveva: 6/10
Mar 24 2024 : Guest 35: 7/10
Mar 24 2024 : Guest 82: 7/10
Mar 23 2024 : callie_ross: 1/10
Mar 08 2024 : Guest 110: 2/10
Mar 07 2024 : RicD: 7/10
Mar 04 2024 : Guest 86: 6/10
Feb 16 2024 : Guest 211: 3/10
Feb 11 2024 : Guest 120: 6/10

Score Distribution

quiz
Quiz Answer Key and Fun Facts
1. In science and scholarship the terms 'primary' and 'secondary' have the same meanings in all areas of knowledge.

Answer: False

The meanings of the terms vary from one branch of knowledge to another and are more widely used in the Humanities than, for example, in the natural sciences and social sciences.

The terms 'primary' and 'secondary literature' (rather than 'sources') are probably simplest in literary scholarship, where 'primary literature' refers to actual literary works (and letters, diaries, etc.) and 'secondary literature' to writings about them. This applies even if the actual original text is uncertain, as for example with Shakespeare's plays and medieval epics. (In such cases one will have to use a modern edition).

The distinction is useful: primary sources are, as it were, the 'raw material' of research, while secondary sources are the published products of research and scholarship.
2. A primary source is often described as a document, artefact or other object or record produced 'at the time'. Which of these would NOT count as a primary source for events in 17th century England?

Answer: A book on 17th century England written in the 20th century

A book written long after the time cannot be a primary source. Obviously, if you read Pepys' diary you will do so in a modern edition, probably with modernized spelling and helpful notes, but provided the editor's job has been done properly, you will be reading a primary source.

Note that a primary source can also be read and used in translation.
3. Which of these would NOT normally be regarded as a primary source?

Answer: Editorials in newspapers

Routinely compiled reports, transcripts of legal proceedings, chronicles, letters, diaries, photographs and so on are primary sources (provided they have not been tampered with). Artefacts produced at the time are also primary: these can be as diverse as coins, cooking utensils, furniture and weapons.

Editorials are statements of opinion and are therefore secondary sources.

(Obviously, if you are actually studying editorials that appeared on the outbreak of World War I, for example, relevant editorials would be your primary source).
4. Secondary sources are books and articles derived from primary sources. They interpret and analyse. Some secondary works are 'peer reviewed', that is, they are read and assessed by colleagues of the author. If a peer reviewed work is accepted for publication, what does that mean over and above the obvious fact that it conforms to academic norms?

Answer: That it is considered a worthwhile contribution to academic discussion of the topic

There are sometimes misunderstandings about the significance of a peer review. It is *not* an endorsement of accuracy, but an assessment of the value (or otherwise) of the work as a contribution to knowledge or academic debate.

In practice, there are variations in the level of thoroughness of peer reviews.
It is common for students and others to take into account the reputation of the journal or publisher.
5. Sometimes a secondary work may be treated as a primary work. In what circumstances, if any, would a book on the Crusades published in 1860 be a primary source?

Answer: In a study of Victorian portrayals of the Crusades

For most purposes, however, such a book would be an out of date secondary source of rather limited usefulness, though it might provide a useful timeline.

Unlike primary sources, secondary sources become out of date over time.
6. Generally speaking, what kind of source is an autobiography?

Answer: Primary but needs treating with caution

An eye-witness remains an eye-witness, but obviously, one needs to assess autobiographies carefully. Key questions to ask include things like: How long after the events was the autobiography written? Did the author write from memory or are there quotations from sources such as letters and archive material? Is the author trying to justify himself/herself?

Just as there are 'biographies romancées' ('novelized biographies') there are also autobiographies that have been embroidered and spiced up in order to entertain the reader and help sell the book. The boundary between autobiography and the novel can be very fluid in some cases.

Note that some 'autobiographies', especially of celebrities, are ghostwritten.
7. What kind of source is an article in an encyclopedia or comparable reference work?

Answer: Tertiary

Such articles are generally an overview based on key secondary works. Their main function is to produce an introductory outline. They can also be very useful for checking facts.

School and undergraduate textbooks are also tertiary sources, being based mainly on information derived from secondary sources. Some history course-books reprint a few carefully selected, short primary texts for students to use in their work, but this does not alter the tertiary status of such books.

Scholarship does not recognize a fourth (quarternary) level of sources. However, a case can be made for regarding abstracting journals - that is, journals that only publish short summaries of articles and books - as a special category in their own right.
8. Primary sources are more reliable than secondary sources.

Answer: False

This is a myth that can be found on the internet - for example, on some question-and-answer sites and in various other places, too. Even where there is no deliberate distortion, eye-witness accounts give *perceptions*, which may or may not accord with facts.

In practice, eye-witness accounts often include various stories circulating at the time in addition to what the eye-witness actually saw. A good secondary source, however, will often include evaluations of primary sources.
9. A friend says to you, 'My grandfather's an expert on World War II. He took part in the Normandy landings'. What is this man an expert on *simply by virtue of having taken part in the D-Day landings*?

Answer: His own experiences during the Normandy landings

A tendency in some kinds of History teaching to get pupils to interview veterans and others seems to have encouraged a tendency to credit people with personal experience of key events in the past with more expertise than they normally have.
10. When writing academic essays or other assignments one must give details of all sources. Why? (Please read all the options before answering).

Answer: For all of these reasons

Quite apart from the matter of plagiarism, a teacher or other reader may, for example, wonder whether you have misunderstood something in your source(s). If details of the sources are not given, the reader has to try to guess where you got your information from or may simply suspect that you used some unreliable source.
Source: Author bloomsby

This quiz was reviewed by FunTrivia editor Exit10 before going online.
Any errors found in FunTrivia content are routinely corrected through our feedback system.
3/28/2024, Copyright 2024 FunTrivia, Inc. - Report an Error / Contact Us