|
1.
It's generally agreed that Kurt Tank had a winner with the Fw 187 "Falke". Why did this machine not enter series production? |
|
2.
From late 1942 forward, countering the daylight bombing threat became a focus for the RLM. Which of these machines was designed to address the "problem"? |
|
3.
This aircraft was the "also ran" in the design competition that gave us the better known Me 321 "Gigant". Which of these was it? |
|
4.
In the "warm afterglow" following the capitulation of France, the return of peacetime aviation seemed a foregone conclusion. Which of these aircraft was designed to meet a Lufthansa specification for a Ju 52/3m replacement? |
|
5.
Everyone knows about the Messerschmitt Me 163; what was the Messerschmitt Bf 163? |
|
6.
The Bomber "B" specification (issued in July 1939) was tailored around a Junkers design, already selected by the RLM. Which of these designations would Projekt EF.74 later receive? |
|
7.
In a number of cases RLM 8-xxx production numbers were "recycled"; author Heinz J. Nowarra's list is generally considered as "the Bible" when this matter is discussed. One of these numbers was (the previously mentioned) 8-163; which of the following was another of the better known instances?
Hint: it also has a Messerschmitt connection. |
|
8.
Once faced with organized fighter defenses, it was obvious that the Ju 87B required a serious reassessment. The resultant Ju 187 contained one very novel feature; which of the following was it? |
|
9.
Following the conclusion of the "bases for destroyers" deal in 1940, the RLM issued the first specification for an aircraft that could bomb the USA and return; which of these was never a contender for the contract? |
|
10.
The Arado Ar 240 was designed to meet the specification for a replacement of the Bf 110 in the "Zerst?rer" role; what role did it ultimately see service in? |
|
report error/typo/spelling mistake (new window)
Copyright, FunTrivia.com. All Rights Reserved. Legal / Conditions of Use
|