|
|
Is this sentence grammatically correct? Hopefully we will be home by twelve o'clock.
Question
#102197. Asked by Bronxiteone. (Jan 08 09 10:53 AM)
|
zbeckabee

|
The word hopefully seems like a common word with a well-known meaning. But because it's used improperly so often, it's use can be highly annoying to many. Hopefully is an adverb. It's not a verb as it is most commonly used. The use of hopefully as a verb in its own right usually comes from a mistaken belief about the meaning of the word. Using the word hopefully as a substitute for the phrase “I hope” or “it is hoped” is the most common, but incorrect, usage.
The Correct Usage -- Using the word correctly as an adverb means to substitute it instead for the phrase “full of hope” or "in a hopeful manner." When unsure whether the word is being used correctly, simply use one of those phrases instead and see whether the sentence still makes sense. There are far fewer times to use the word correctly than there are to use it incorrectly, which has made many grammar sticklers angry about the word being used at all.
http://languagestyle.suite101.com/article.cfm/word_usage
|
queproblema
|
Except for the missing comma, conservative grammarians would say it is grammatically correct if it means we're hoping to find someone or something there when we arrive.
The American Heritage Dictionary argues hopelessly :-) that there is no good reason why it is not an accepted way of saying, "We hope to be home by twelve."
http://www.answers.com/topic/hopefully
Please take the time to enjoy Cathleen Schine's masterful and entertaining essay on the use of "hopefully" as a sentence adverb.
"Hopefully is, in a word, outre. Grammatical propriety cannot countenance it, even if grammatical propriety cannot explain why not."
"Hopefully means "God willing" in a secular world."
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CEEDF1030F933A15755C0A965958260&sec=&spon=
|
DonAndBetty
|
Seems it is (correctly used) here as an adverb modifying "be": We will (hopefully be) home by twelve o'clock. Yes it probably ought be followed by a comma when so distantly preceding the verb, as it does in the example. Pogo would say, that's grammatawackle.
|
Find something useful here? Please help us spread the word about FunTrivia. Recommend this page below!
|