spidersghost43
|
Better than a naked McGonigall Reply #1. Nov 06 09, 8:27 AM |
priya1234
|
erm i dont have any prob. in seeing daniel radcliff naked....hehehe Reply #2. Nov 06 09, 9:39 AM |
romeomikegolf
|
This may put the rating up so many young fans can't go and see the film.Is there official confirmation of this, or is it just publicity hype? Reply #3. Nov 06 09, 10:01 AM |
sarahcateh
|
This makes me even more excited about the movie! lol Hopefully it will be done in a way that actually makes sense and doesn't seem like such a ploy for attention (as if the Harry Potter franchise needs more attention). Reply #4. Nov 07 09, 6:36 PM |
diamondback1
|
I know when that is—it happened in the book, too. I bet they'll just keep the screen up to waist height. Be careful with camera angles, and all that. Reply #5. Nov 11 09, 10:03 PM |
sarahcateh
|
I just figured out which scene it will probably be. If I'm right, it will be really easy for them to keep it from the waist up. Reply #6. Nov 12 09, 5:54 PM |
jolana
|
Hasn´t he already been naked in GoF in the Prefect bathroom? Only Moaning Myrtle knows his secret. Reply #7. Nov 12 09, 6:10 PM |
jonnowales
|
"Only Moaning Myrtle knows his secret." LOL Jolana. Thanks for the giggle - much needed. :) Reply #8. Nov 12 09, 6:51 PM |
halfbloodfreak
|
What would the difference be most fans have already seen Daniel naked on the internet. But i really don't think they'll have him fully naked in the movie. Too many little kids love harry potter and their parents wont let them go see the movie if a full grown man is naked on the screen. Reply #9. Nov 30 09, 10:13 AM |
puffle23
|
hes going to be in his underwear and thats the part were he jumps in the pool. Reply #10. May 16 10, 6:03 PM |
GuruOfTrivia
|
I agree that they will not do it because of the kids. HE wouldn't have a problem with it though. He's already done it live in the broadway play Equus. Reply #11. May 22 10, 6:34 AM |
spidersghost43
|
When Tonks drops trou let me know Reply #12. Nov 09 10, 10:45 AM |
DR.NO
|
Guess we'll find out if he's really Hairy after all... Reply #13. Nov 09 10, 1:29 PM |
coolguy10101
|
In part 1 he and all his clones went down to their underwear. Reply #14. Jan 06 11, 7:00 PM |
daymare
|
I shall close my eyes. Why the need for being naked? I don't get it. Reply #15. Feb 10 11, 3:48 PM |
supersal1
|
"Too many little kids love harry potter and their parents wont let them go see the movie if a full grown man is naked on the screen." Presumably they're OK with someone being tortured, murdered and eaten by a giant snake (first scene!). Seriously, I wouldn't recommend this film for little kids and it has a 12A certificate, which means it is not really suitable for those under 12, although they can be admitted to the cinema to see it if accompanied by an adult. If Daniel Radcliffe was in the buff I must have blinked and missed it, so I don't think any tots are going to be corrupted for life by seeing a naked body! Reply #16. Feb 10 11, 5:13 PM |
jolana
|
Well said, supersal. Reply #17. Feb 10 11, 7:24 PM |
tazemaster
|
They'll probably fuzz everything inapropiate out. I feel sorry for Daniel Radcliffe for having to do that scene. Reply #18. Jul 08 11, 4:43 PM |
tazemaster
|
ACtually, I'm reading an Entertainmnt magazine all about the 10 years of Harry Potter, and when Harry is in the dream thing, it says Harry will be fully clothed, so he's not going to be naked after all. Reply #19. Jul 14 11, 3:01 PM |
Rachel xx
|
Haha, you're all safe. He was fully clothed. I don't think they would have done it like that anyway. Reply #20. Jul 25 11, 7:00 AM |
This thread has been closed to new replies. |
|