FatherSteve
|
I have submitted "refectory" to Humanities and "the blood of Saint Januarius" to Religion. These being my fourth set from this list, I am mute. Reply #61. Jan 25 19, 10:57 AM |
Nealzineatser
|
" Brahms" and "whirlpool" both accepted for review. I have just submitted another pair- "Centers for Disease Control" and "saloon" Reply #62. Jan 25 19, 11:19 AM |
kyleisalive
|
'Village' is in Movies and 'Tierra del Fuego' is in Geography. Reply #63. Jan 25 19, 2:28 PM |
kyleisalive
|
I'll take scissors and Kristi Yamaguchi as well. Reply #64. Jan 25 19, 2:31 PM |
kyleisalive
|
And they went to Humanities and Celebrities, respectively. That's my set this time. Reply #65. Jan 25 19, 2:57 PM |
celvet
|
I posted "halibut" to hobbies and "Upper Paleolithic" to history. I tried to make "Upper Paleolithic" as easy as possible, but I do have to ask: Many of these terms (while enchanting and wonderful to work with for us authors) are almost impossible to make into simple questions. While that is (doubtless) a part of the charm of this game, it still is difficult to fit the term "Upper Paleolithic" into an easy question for quizees. I sort of cringed when I saw the instructions this time. What are other people's thoughts about this. I know that many of you are editors. What do you think? Reply #66. Jan 26 19, 11:55 AM |
celvet
|
For my sins, I will do "totem" and "dust devil". . . Reply #67. Jan 26 19, 11:57 AM |
FatherSteve
|
celvet, for your contrition and penance, you will be forgiven. Father Steve Reply #68. Jan 26 19, 12:20 PM |
FatherSteve
|
When writing a question about the Stone Age, why not ask something about the Neanderthals and Michael Crichton's "Eaters of the Dead"? You have now changed an obscure history question into an only-slightly-less obscure literature question. Reply #69. Jan 26 19, 12:24 PM |
trident
|
Hi celvet, I had a look at the question, and as a former archaeology student, I found it quite interesting! But I understand that not everyone is going to be able to answer that type of question. A lot of these topics are intentionally more obscure so as to get those creative juices flowing and perhaps teach the players a new tidbit of information. (For my own single questions, I have found that topics that are a bit tired get low marks and topics which include an interesting new tidbit get rated highly.) I'm not sure what was cringe-worthy about the instructions this time around as they are identical to the last several rounds. I'll just say that when writing a question using one of these nouns, it can be related in a somewhat roundabout way. FatherSteve gives a good example of this. As long as you include the noun in either the question or as the answer itself, and it is somehow related, I won't too picky about how you go about writing your question. Reply #70. Jan 26 19, 6:19 PM |
celvet
|
Hello Trident: You misunderstood. Your instructions were (for the game) were not "cringeworthy". Rather, while inputting the question, I got to the page wherein (in big letters) we are told to write easy questions. Yes, I see that every time, but this time I felt that the question that I was putting in was a bit more difficult than normal. That is what I was writing about. I was just wondering whether others felt that way as well, not trying to critique this game which I genuinely love. Reply #71. Jan 26 19, 9:14 PM |
celvet
|
Father Steve: Thank you very much. With regard to the lit question, I am rather ignorant when it comes to that particular one of MC's books -- but also, it had to be the Upper Paleolithic. Would that piece of literature address that term? Reply #72. Jan 26 19, 9:16 PM |
trident
|
Right, we do try to steer authors towards questions that are more approachable and those in which players will have a reasonable chance of at least guessing correctly. It can be a tough balance to figure out, even for editors, and there have been questions I have written that I thought would get somewhere around 60% correct and turned out 25%. As long as you aren't writing questions based on extreme minutia, the editors will likely accept it. We also need difficult questions in the question pool! Reply #73. Jan 26 19, 9:51 PM |
angikar
|
I claim 'faith' and 'lotus position'. Reply #74. Jan 27 19, 4:10 AM |
FatherSteve
|
Angikar got a new avatar! Its name is Leo and it just retired from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer! Well done, good sir. Reply #75. Jan 27 19, 12:56 PM |
angikar
|
Just mentioning, when you are free Kyle, please update 100 Nouns 8 in the Current Challenges thread. And do put a star beside Disney Long Haul and Book Club. Reply #76. Jan 28 19, 4:22 AM |
LadyNym
|
"Shrine" was just submitted in World. I need to find another idea for "Republic of Zaire", as the question I had in mind already exists (though not in identical form). Reply #77. Jan 28 19, 3:00 PM |
kyleisalive
|
Re: "Just mentioning, when you are free Kyle, please update 100 Nouns 8 in the Current Challenges thread. And do put a star beside Disney Long Haul and Book Club." No thank you. I don't put stars next to challenges which are either expected to run for indefinite periods of time or challenges with as many titles as the Disney Long-Haul. At the speed 100 Nouns has been going, I almost wonder if it would be worth it to add to the 'looking for authors' post since it seems to be clearing faster than anything else as is. Reply #78. Jan 28 19, 4:30 PM |
trident
|
Whatever you think works best is okay in my book. I think the pace has a lot to do with the quick nature of writing single questions. Reply #79. Jan 28 19, 5:35 PM |
MiraJane
|
Wandering into the fray .... I would like bungalow and "Incense and Peppermints" to double my submitted questions count. Reply #80. Jan 28 19, 8:45 PM |
|