38. Genesis 3 discusses which trickster that was PERHAPS a dinosaur?
From Quiz A Boy and His Dinosaur
Answer:
Serpent
Young earth creationists often believe that the Biblical dragons were dinosaurs or dinosaur-like creatures and that dinosaurs living with people throughout history helped to inspire dragon stories.
There is a considerable amount of evidence that the original serpent was a dragon. I have found several articles from Bible believers that state that the original serpent was probably a dragon, and the Bible, at times, seems to use "dragon" and "serpent" interchangeably. In Exodus, Moses' staff turns into a "nakhash" and Aaron's turns into a "tannin", but both are translated as "serpents". The word "tannin" in other verses is frequently translated as "dragon" but sometimes different translations of the same verses will use "serpent" or "snake". The New Testament book of Revelation consistently uses "dragon" and "that old serpent" to refer to Satan, the fallen angel whom Christians believe used the serpent to deceive humankind. In a similar way, the Old Testament calls Leviathan "the dragon" and "the serpent".
Deuteronomy 32:33 of the King James and several other translations, including Young's Literal Translation, refer to venom of "dragons" and then the poison of "cobras" or "asps", like they are connected, if not interchangeable. Other translations say "serpents" instead of "dragons" and then refer to the specific snake sub-species.
For the interesting information above, I am referring to common translations, such as the New American Standard, the King James, Young's Literal, the New Living, and the New International Version, to name a few. BibleGateway.com is a great way to view verses from many different translations side by side.
In Genesis 3, as punishment for the animal's part in the conspiracy, God curses it to be the most cursed animal--it would crawl on its belly and eat dust. This suggests that the original creature at least had legs and probably didn't have a fork tongue. Of course, we can only imagine what the serpent was like; did it have wings? Could it breathe fire?
Even secular sources like Britannica and Wikipedia say that the word "dragon" derives from the Greek "drakon", which means "serpent" and that some mythological dragons were/are considered to be snake-like. Others seem more lizard-like, hence the dinosaur belief. Mythological dragons are apparently very intelligent, while the Bible implies that serpents are intelligent.
If dragons of Scripture were dinosaurs, and the original serpent was a dragon, then it is possible that the serpent was a TYPE of dinosaur--a type that got cursed while most dinosaurs didn't. I say that the original serpent, based upon the evidence, was probably a "dragon"--I think it could very well have been a dragon like the fantasy stories portray or even like the Leviathan from the book of Job. I also say that PERHAPS it was a type of dinosaur. I know that this is controversial stuff. Even if all Christians agreed that the serpent was a dragon (which they don't) not all Christians are going to agree that dragons were dinosaurs or vice-versa. But it is a popular theory among some Christians.