A multiple-choice quiz
by CellarDoor.
Estimated time: 8 mins.

- Home
- »
- Quizzes
- »
- Science Trivia
- »
- Physics

Scroll down to the bottom for the answer key.

Quiz Answer Key and Fun Facts

Answer:
**No. Stephen will be older than Hendrik.**

This is the celebrated twin paradox! One of the more bizarre effects of relativity is that there is no universal clock. Elapsed time depends on speed, and a moving clock runs slow. Hendrik, whose body clock is moving at relativistic speeds, will age more slowly on his trip than Stephen will at home; it's a small effect, but it will add up over time. (But wait! From Hendrik's perspective, isn't Stephen the one who's moving, so shouldn't he be younger? It isn't quite that simple -- to get to relativistic speeds, Hendrik must accelerate, and then decelerate to come back to rest. It's the acceleration and deceleration that makes their "world lines," and thus their proper times, asymmetric. The twin "paradox" isn't really a paradox at all.)

By the way, Albert, Max, Hendrik and Stephen are named for four famous physicists who have worked out the principles of special and general relativity: Albert Einstein, Max Planck, Hendrik Lorentz, and Stephen Hawking.

This is the celebrated twin paradox! One of the more bizarre effects of relativity is that there is no universal clock. Elapsed time depends on speed, and a moving clock runs slow. Hendrik, whose body clock is moving at relativistic speeds, will age more slowly on his trip than Stephen will at home; it's a small effect, but it will add up over time. (But wait! From Hendrik's perspective, isn't Stephen the one who's moving, so shouldn't he be younger? It isn't quite that simple -- to get to relativistic speeds, Hendrik must accelerate, and then decelerate to come back to rest. It's the acceleration and deceleration that makes their "world lines," and thus their proper times, asymmetric. The twin "paradox" isn't really a paradox at all.)

By the way, Albert, Max, Hendrik and Stephen are named for four famous physicists who have worked out the principles of special and general relativity: Albert Einstein, Max Planck, Hendrik Lorentz, and Stephen Hawking.

Answer:
**Yes. Length is only contracted in the direction of motion, so the load is just as wide at 0.7c as it is at rest.**

Here we encounter the important quantity gamma = 1 / sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2), where sqrt = square root. In the phenomenon of length contraction, a fast-moving object appears to be foreshortened in the direction of motion. If L is the object's rest length, then an observer watching the object move at relative speed v will measure a length of L/gamma.

But only the length in the direction of motion is shortened! The driver of the wide load is moving forward in his three lanes, but the width of the load is perpendicular to the forward direction and isn't contracted at all.

When the officers were following behind, by the way, they would not have perceived any length contraction at all since they were moving at about the same speed. The patrol car and the space station were at rest relative to each other, in the same way that cars you pass on the highway often appear to be standing still.

Here we encounter the important quantity gamma = 1 / sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2), where sqrt = square root. In the phenomenon of length contraction, a fast-moving object appears to be foreshortened in the direction of motion. If L is the object's rest length, then an observer watching the object move at relative speed v will measure a length of L/gamma.

But only the length in the direction of motion is shortened! The driver of the wide load is moving forward in his three lanes, but the width of the load is perpendicular to the forward direction and isn't contracted at all.

When the officers were following behind, by the way, they would not have perceived any length contraction at all since they were moving at about the same speed. The patrol car and the space station were at rest relative to each other, in the same way that cars you pass on the highway often appear to be standing still.

Answer:
**c**

This is the basic defining principle of special relativity: light in a vacuum travels at c, no more and no less, in absolutely any reference frame you choose to measure it! This seems counterintuitive to us, living in a basically Newtonian world where a tennis ball thrown at 20 mph from a train moving 80 mph is going at 100 mph relative to the ground, but the invariance of the speed of light is absolutely necessary so that the laws of physics are the same everywhere and at any speed.

This is the basic defining principle of special relativity: light in a vacuum travels at c, no more and no less, in absolutely any reference frame you choose to measure it! This seems counterintuitive to us, living in a basically Newtonian world where a tennis ball thrown at 20 mph from a train moving 80 mph is going at 100 mph relative to the ground, but the invariance of the speed of light is absolutely necessary so that the laws of physics are the same everywhere and at any speed.

Answer:
**They should pull it over: it's speeding at 0.915 c.**

Luckily for the rule of law (but unluckily for the speeding pilot), Officer Max remembers the rule of velocity addition in special relativity: V' = (Va + Vb)/(1 + Va Vb / c^2). Here, Va = 0.6 c is the velocity of the speeder relative to the radar gun, and Vb = 0.7 c is the velocity of the radar gun relative to the road, so V' = 0.915 c is the velocity of the speeder relative to the road. Slower-moving police officers (like the ones on Earth highways today) can get away with using the low-speed approximation V' = Va + Vb, but this gives nonsensical answers at relativistic speeds: no matter how hard that pilot is pressing the gas, he certainly can't fly a ship at 1.3 c. That's faster than light -- not allowed!

Luckily for the rule of law (but unluckily for the speeding pilot), Officer Max remembers the rule of velocity addition in special relativity: V' = (Va + Vb)/(1 + Va Vb / c^2). Here, Va = 0.6 c is the velocity of the speeder relative to the radar gun, and Vb = 0.7 c is the velocity of the radar gun relative to the road, so V' = 0.915 c is the velocity of the speeder relative to the road. Slower-moving police officers (like the ones on Earth highways today) can get away with using the low-speed approximation V' = Va + Vb, but this gives nonsensical answers at relativistic speeds: no matter how hard that pilot is pressing the gas, he certainly can't fly a ship at 1.3 c. That's faster than light -- not allowed!

Answer:
**Nothing. The ship's uniform acceleration acts the same way as the Earth's gravitational field.**

This is Einstein's famous equivalence principle: There is no experiment (not even a tennis game!) that can distinguish a uniform acceleration from a uniform gravitational field. The formulation of the equivalence principle led Einstein to discover general relativity, so it made sense that he would later describe it as "'glueckischste Gedanke meines Lebens,' the happiest thought of my life."

This is Einstein's famous equivalence principle: There is no experiment (not even a tennis game!) that can distinguish a uniform acceleration from a uniform gravitational field. The formulation of the equivalence principle led Einstein to discover general relativity, so it made sense that he would later describe it as "'glueckischste Gedanke meines Lebens,' the happiest thought of my life."

Answer:
**Yes. An observer moving toward a red light at just over 0.1 c will see it as green.**

The Doppler shift is well-known to anyone who has listened to a train or an ambulance as it passes by. As the source approaches you, the sound appears to have a higher frequency ("blue shift"); as it moves away from you, it appears to have a lower frequency ("red shift"). The same effect happens for light (which is, after all, a wave) when the source or observer is moving at relativistic speeds. We can use the relativistic Doppler shift formula. Let v be the speed of the observer, w be the wavelength of the source, and w' be the observed wavelength of the source. Then:

Z = (w' - w)/w = sqrt((1 + v/c)/(1 - v/c)) - 1

where a positive velocity means that the observer is moving away from the source. The shortest wavelength in the red range is 625 nm and the longest wavelength in the green range is 565 nm, so we can solve for v and determine that this Doppler shift could have happened if the pilot was traveling toward the red light at 0.101 c. Clearly we'll need to make some refinements before traffic lights are ready for use on relativistic highways!

The Doppler shift is well-known to anyone who has listened to a train or an ambulance as it passes by. As the source approaches you, the sound appears to have a higher frequency ("blue shift"); as it moves away from you, it appears to have a lower frequency ("red shift"). The same effect happens for light (which is, after all, a wave) when the source or observer is moving at relativistic speeds. We can use the relativistic Doppler shift formula. Let v be the speed of the observer, w be the wavelength of the source, and w' be the observed wavelength of the source. Then:

Z = (w' - w)/w = sqrt((1 + v/c)/(1 - v/c)) - 1

where a positive velocity means that the observer is moving away from the source. The shortest wavelength in the red range is 625 nm and the longest wavelength in the green range is 565 nm, so we can solve for v and determine that this Doppler shift could have happened if the pilot was traveling toward the red light at 0.101 c. Clearly we'll need to make some refinements before traffic lights are ready for use on relativistic highways!

Answer:
**Weightlessness**

The sensation of weight is due to a mass experiencing some acceleration. On the surface of the Earth, our weight is due to the force of gravity, which accelerates us downward at 9.8 m/s^2. On the surface of the Moon, the force of gravity is only a sixth as much as on Earth, so we only feel a sixth our normal weight. Non-gravitational acceleration has the same effect -- this is why you're pushed back into your seat when you accelerate your car or as your plane speeds up before taking off. If there's no acceleration at all -- no gravity, constant speed -- then there's no weight either. Hopefully the officers will find it relaxing!

The sensation of weight is due to a mass experiencing some acceleration. On the surface of the Earth, our weight is due to the force of gravity, which accelerates us downward at 9.8 m/s^2. On the surface of the Moon, the force of gravity is only a sixth as much as on Earth, so we only feel a sixth our normal weight. Non-gravitational acceleration has the same effect -- this is why you're pushed back into your seat when you accelerate your car or as your plane speeds up before taking off. If there's no acceleration at all -- no gravity, constant speed -- then there's no weight either. Hopefully the officers will find it relaxing!

Answer:
**No. Only 16 hours have passed for the trucker since his last nap, so as long as he sleeps before leaving the truck stop, he's fine.**

Officer Albert has just encountered the amazing phenomenon of time dilation, perhaps most famous for the twin paradox described in Question 1. The clock inside the moving truck measures an elapsed time equal to the elapsed station time, times a factor of gamma. (We defined gamma in Question 2; for a velocity of 0.6 c, gamma is equal to 5/4.) Thus, the trucker experiences only 4 hours for every 5 that pass on the road. Moving clocks run slow!

Officer Albert has just encountered the amazing phenomenon of time dilation, perhaps most famous for the twin paradox described in Question 1. The clock inside the moving truck measures an elapsed time equal to the elapsed station time, times a factor of gamma. (We defined gamma in Question 2; for a velocity of 0.6 c, gamma is equal to 5/4.) Thus, the trucker experiences only 4 hours for every 5 that pass on the road. Moving clocks run slow!

Answer:
**12 million tons**

If we define the rest mass as m0, then the relativistic mass is m0 times gamma (the quantity defined in Question 2; at a speed of 0.6 c, gamma is 5/4). The rest mass limit is then the relativistic mass limit divided by 5/4, or 12 million tons.

The idea of relativistic mass was introduced to make clear that objects pick up more and more inertia as they move faster and faster; that is, the closer you are to the speed of light, the harder it is to accelerate! Modern textbooks are phasing this concept out in favor of the idea of relativistic momentum (p = m0 gamma v instead of m v), but the concept is still useful. I'm sure some of the truckers whom Officer Hendrik tickets wish that relativistic mass had been phased out a little sooner!

If we define the rest mass as m0, then the relativistic mass is m0 times gamma (the quantity defined in Question 2; at a speed of 0.6 c, gamma is 5/4). The rest mass limit is then the relativistic mass limit divided by 5/4, or 12 million tons.

The idea of relativistic mass was introduced to make clear that objects pick up more and more inertia as they move faster and faster; that is, the closer you are to the speed of light, the harder it is to accelerate! Modern textbooks are phasing this concept out in favor of the idea of relativistic momentum (p = m0 gamma v instead of m v), but the concept is still useful. I'm sure some of the truckers whom Officer Hendrik tickets wish that relativistic mass had been phased out a little sooner!

Answer:
**16 minutes**

Elapsed time = distance / speed. The distance is 8 light-minutes, which means the distance that light travels in 8 minutes. Since our heroes are traveling at only half the speed of light, it will take them twice as long to traverse the distance: 16 minutes.

The trip will take even less time as measured by the shipboard clock due to the effects of length contraction. From the ship's perspective, the station is moving towards it at 0.5 c, but has a shortened distance to travel -- namely 8 light minutes divided by gamma (defined in Question 2 and here equal to the square root of 4/3). From the perspective of the officers, it only takes a little over four and a half minutes to get to the intersection. We can get the same answer a different way by using the principle of time dilation.

Elapsed time = distance / speed. The distance is 8 light-minutes, which means the distance that light travels in 8 minutes. Since our heroes are traveling at only half the speed of light, it will take them twice as long to traverse the distance: 16 minutes.

The trip will take even less time as measured by the shipboard clock due to the effects of length contraction. From the ship's perspective, the station is moving towards it at 0.5 c, but has a shortened distance to travel -- namely 8 light minutes divided by gamma (defined in Question 2 and here equal to the square root of 4/3). From the perspective of the officers, it only takes a little over four and a half minutes to get to the intersection. We can get the same answer a different way by using the principle of time dilation.

This quiz was reviewed by FunTrivia editor crisw before going online.

Any errors found in FunTrivia content are routinely corrected through our feedback system.

Most Recent Scores

Mar 17 2023
:
TERRYROYHURST: 0/10Feb 22 2023 : Mikeytrout44: 8/10

Feb 12 2023 : Guest 24: 4/10

Feb 05 2023 : sam388:

Score Distribution

Related Quizzes

This quiz is part of series
1. **Afrikaans to Zulu** Tough

2.**Special Relativity and the Space Patrol** Tough

3.**Could YOU Play Tournament Scrabble?** Very Difficult

4.**Basic Forensic Science 2** Difficult

5.**500 Club: Ahead of Time** Easier

6.**HIV - Fact or Fiction** Easier

7.**Anatomy of a Song: "American Pie"** Average

8.**Our Schedule for the Future** Average

9.**England at Italia '90** Average

10.**Back to the Future** Tough

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Also part of quiz list

Referenced Topics

Editor's Choice
General
World
Science
The Law
Trains
Physics
Cats
Moons
Blue
Maps
Green
Trucks
Albert Einstein
Other Destinations

Explore Other Quizzes by Go to

More

FunTrivia